Open Access

The progesterone receptor PROGINS polymorphism is not related to oxidative stress factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

  • Muammer Karadeniz1Email author,
  • Mehmet Erdogan1,
  • Afig Berdeli2,
  • Sadik Tamsel3,
  • Fusun Saygili1 and
  • Candeger Yilmaz1
Cardiovascular Diabetology20076:29

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-6-29

Received: 29 May 2007

Accepted: 05 October 2007

Published: 05 October 2007

Abstract

Background

Women with PCOS have been reported to be at increased risk of a number of gynaecological neoplasias, including endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancer. Studies of the possible association of genetic variation in progesterone receptor polymorphism with risk of ovarian and breast cancer have concentrated on a variant known as PROGINS.

Methods

Ninety-five young women with PCOS and 99 healthy control women were included in our study. All subjects underwent venous blood drawing for complete hormonal assays, lipid profile, glucose, insulin and PROGINS polymorphism genetic study.

Results

In PROGINS polymorphism results; in both control and the patient groups T1/T1 has been detected in high levels. But for genotype (p = 0.178) and allele (p = 0.555) frequencies both of the groups give similar results. Statistically significant difference has been detected on serum FSH levels for T1/T1 genotype according to T2/T2 genotype.

Conclusion

No relation has been detected between the inflammatory and oxidative stress factors, and PROGINS polymorphism alleles. This may be because the PCOS patients are young and their BMI means are normal and their CIMT and oxidative stress markers are like healthy women.

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most encountered endocrine malfunctions, which typically occur with chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenism [1]. Almost 15% of the women at reproductive period complain about PCOS [2]. Women with PCOS have been reported to be at increased risk of a number of gynaecological neoplasias, including endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancer [3]. The reproductive abnormalities in PCOS include chronic anovulation, prolonged exposure to oestrogen, progesterone deficiency, and androgen excess, which may contribute to an increased risk for gynaecological cancers in which the hormonal milieu is an important contributor to aetiology and prognosis.

Oxidative damage has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many chronic progressive diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, and neurodegenerative disorders. Emerging risk factors such as oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial cell activation are thought to play integral roles in the development of atherosclerotic lesions and cancer [4, 5].

In women with PCOS who are anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory, the regulatory roles of progesterone and progesterone withdrawal in the endometrial tissue are suboptimal or absent. In previously studies, heterozygous PROGINS constitution might lead to an over expression of progesterone inducible target genes even at physiologic levels of progesterone [6]. Moreover, this mechanism may contribute to the process of malignant transformation, atherosclerosis, Oxidative stress, insulin resistance.

The human progesterone receptor is a single copy gene located on chromosome 11q22-23 [7]. The actions of progesterone are mediated by two functionally distinct receptor isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, which are expressed from a single gene as a result of transcription from two alternative promoters [8]. Progesterone acts as a mitogen for breast tissue [9, 10], and adding progestin's to menopausal oestrogen therapy increases mammographyical density, which is in turn associated with breast cancer risk [10]. Studies of the possible association of genetic variation in PGR with risk of ovarian [1113] and breast cancer [14] have concentrated on a variant known as PROGINS. Progesterone is involved in the regulation of VSMC proliferation and modulates the synthesis of proinflammatory proteins such as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, matrix metalloproteinase, E-selectin, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [15, 16].

It is not known what impact PROGINS polymorphism may have on the inflammation process of the vasculature. The purpose of present study is to investigate the insulin resistance, inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, fibrinogen) and PROGINS Polymorphisms in young women with PCOS.

Methods

Informed consent had been obtained before study in all patients and controls. Ninety-five young women (mean age, 24.27 ± 5.44 SD years) with PCOS and 99 healthy control women (mean age, 26.41 ± 5.65 SD years) were included in our study. PCOS was defined by the Rotterdam PCOS consensus criteria [17]. In all subjects (patients and controls) baseline plasma concentrations of LH, FSH, total testosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), dihydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S), oestradiol, SHBG and prolactin (PRL) were determined during the follicular phase (cycle days 5–7) after spontaneous or progestin-induced cycles.

Patients who had DM, hyperprolactinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia (diagnosed with the adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test), thyroid disorders, Cushing's syndrome, hypertension, hepatic or renal dysfunction were excluded from the study. Confounding medications, including oral contraceptive agents, hypertensive medications and insulin sensitizing drugs, and those, which may affect the metabolic criteria, were questioned.

Initially, ninety-nine patients were taken to the study but 4 patients were left voluntarily due to different personal reasons (genotype success rate = 96,6%). Similarly, 5 individual of 103 individuals were left the study voluntarily (genotype success rate = 95,8%). In all subjects, a clinical examination and an evaluation of hirsutism score by the Ferriman-Gallwey Classification were performed for each woman, a BMI (determined as weight in kg/height in m) were evaluated [18]. Individuals participating in the control group were the individuals who had laboratorial normal f-testosterone, total – testosterone, FSH, LH and basal insulin without acne, alopecia, menstrual disorder, and hirsutism. Healthy young volunteer females matched for age, body mass index (BMI), and allele frequency, were included and considered as the control group. Their healthy state was determined by medical history, physical and pelvic examination, and complete blood chemistry.

Study protocol

At study entry, all subjects underwent venous blood drawing for complete hormonal assays, lipid profile, glucose, and insulin and PROGINS polymorphism genetic study. All blood samples were obtained in the morning between 08.00 and 09.00 hours after an overnight fasting, and resting in bed during early follicular phase of the spontaneous or P-induced menstrual cycle. During the same visit, all subjects underwent anthropometric measurements including BMI and detail history, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and Doppler ultrasonographic (US) examination for the evaluation of CIMT. In present study, data regarding the metabolic alteration, oxidative stress markers and CIMT outcomes, and the genetic evaluation of PROGINS polymorphism will be shown and discussed.

Biochemical and hormonal assay

Serum concentrations of hs-CRP were determined by an immunonephelometric assay (N-high-sensitivity CRP; Dade Behring); intra and interassay CV were 1.72 and 2.80%, respectively. Serum total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were measured by Olympus AU 2700 automated analyzer. Plasma insulin concentrations were determined by Immunolite 2000 using two-site chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Serum glucose levels were determined by the glucose oxidase method. Plasma LH, FSH, PRL, oestradiol, progesterone, 17-OHP, testosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate were measured by RIA. Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) [19], according to the following formula:
HOMA IR = fasting serum insulin  ( mU/ml ) × fasting plasma glucose  ( mmol/l ) 22.5 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=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@86C9@

Genetic study

PROGINS polymorphism was studied in 95 (genotype success rate 96%) young women with PCOS and 99 healthy women (genotype success rate 94%) control group.

PROGINS genotyping

i-DNA purification

Genomic DNA from patients and healthy controls was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using with QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kits 50 (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the PROGINS polymorphism, the following oligonucleotide primers (TIB MOLBIOL Syntheselabor, Berlin-Germany), were used:

Forward 5'TAT GAG CTA TTT GAG TAA AGC CT-3'

Reverse – 5'-TTC TTG CTA AAT GTC TGT TTT AA-3'

ii-PCR conditions

Amplification was carried out on a GeneAmp PCR System 9700(PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in a 25 μl reaction mixture in 0.2 ml thin-wall PCR strip tubes (Axygen Scientific, Inc., CA) containing 1 μl genomic DNA solution, GeneAmp Gold Buffer(15 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mmol/l KCl; PE Applied Biosystems), 1.5 mmol MgCl2, 50 μmol/l each of the dGTP, dATp, dTTP and dCTP (Promega, Madison, WI),5 pmol each forward and reverse primers and 1.0 U AmpliTaq Gold polymerase(PE Applied Biosystems). The cycling conditions comprised a hot start at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 35 amplification cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 45 s, followed by one elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were applied to electrophoretic analysis with the use of a 2% agarose gel Two DNA fragments could be detected: a 185 bp DNA fragment representing 'T1'allele (wild-type) and a 485 bp DNA fragment representing 'T2' allele.

Methods for plasma MDA, NO, total sulfhydryl group measurements

All reagents were purchased from Sigma and Merck. MDA was determined by a modified spectrophometric method of Yagi K [20] using tetrametoxypropan as Standard and BioTek MicroQuant microplate reader. NO was determined by measuring stable NO end-products-nitrite and nitrate levels using Miranda' s spectrophometric method [21] while total sulfhydryl groups was measured using Ellman's reagent by Sedlak and Lindsay's method [22].

Radiological measurement

All examinations were performed by one of the two radiologists experienced in US examinations using an equipment of Sonoline Elegra system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer. The CIMT measurements were performed on the mid portion of the common carotid artery for intima thickness and total thickness including intima and media measurement.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 14.0 for windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago USA) was used for statistical analysis of the results. P < 0.05 values were accepted as statistically significant. The characteristics of the patients with PCOS and the mean plasma glucose, and insulin, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, 17β-estradiol, homocysteine, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, prolactin, testosterone levels between the two clinical groups were compared by Student's t test for unpaired data and between and within the different groups (T1/T1, T1/T2, T2/T2) of PROGINS polymorphism with the ANOVA.

Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed in order to show which one of the parameters for which statistically significantly difference was found at Student's t test between patient and control groups was more associated with PCOS. Allelic and genotypic frequencies were determined from observed genotype counts, and the expectations of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were evaluated by χ2 analysis. Differences in the genotype distribution between different groups were assessed by Pearson's χ2 test of heterogeneity. All results were expressed as means ± SD.

Results

Ninety-five PCOS patients and 99 Healthy controls participated in this study. PCOS patients were divided into three sub-groups (T1/T1, T1/T2, T2/T2) according to their PROGINS gene polymorphism. The result of the biochemical, hormonal and oxidative stress parameters and the Carotid intimae media thickness of the PCOS patients sub-groups according to their PROGINS polymorphism is shown in Table 1. In the patients group no statistically significant differences in HDL – cholesterol, LDL – cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, fasting serum insulin, HOMA-IR, prolactine, f-testosterone, total testosterone, estradiol, DHEAS, fibrinogen, hs-CRP and oxidative stress parameters have been detected (Table 1) (p > 0.05. But a statistically significant difference has been detected on serum FSH levels for T1/T1 genotype according to T2/T2 genotype. In PROGINS polymorphism results; in both control and the patient groups T1/T1 has been detected in high levels (Figure 1). But for genotype (p = 0.178) and allele (p = 0.555) frequencies both of the groups give similar results (Table 2).
Figure 1

MDA, NO, SH Levels and HOMA-IR Index with PCOS according to The PROGINS genotypes.

Table 1

Metabolic and Hormonal Parameters with PCOS According to the PROGINS Genotypes.

 

PCOS Patients (mean ± SD deviation)

 

T1/T1

T1/T2

T2/T2

P

Insulin levels (mIU/ml)

15.3 ± 36.11

15.7 ± 19.01

6.67 ± 4.04

0,39

Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)

90.8 ± 7.7

91.95 ± 11.8

96.67 ± 10

0,55

s-CRP (mg/dl)

0.33 ± 0.3

0.657 ± 1.48

0.15 ± 0.05

0,39

Fibrinogen (mg/dl)

357.2 ± 88.6

384.2 ± 133

338.6 ± 30.4

0,95

Right CIMT (milimeter)

0.42 ± 0.51

0.424 ± 0.43

0.43 ± 0.05

0,85

Left CIMT (milimeter)

0.429 ± 0.52

0.424 ± 0.62

0.433 ± 0.57

0,85

17-OHP (ng/ml)

5.3 ± 2.8

1.9 ± 0.92

2.2 ± 0.8

0,46

HDL – Cholesterol (mg/dL)

56.58 ± 15.3

57.65 ± 14.2

63.6 ± 24.77

0,45

LDL – Cholesterol (mg/dL)

117.1 ± 33.1

109.6 ± 27.5

129.0 ± 47.6

0,42

Triglycerid (mgl/dL)

110.8 ± 60.1

143.7 ± 88.1

89.3 ± 28.5

0,42

Cholesterol (mg/dL)

197.1 ± 44.2

194.0 ± 37.3

210.3 ± 61.7

0,84

F-testosterone (nmol/Ll)

2.91 ± 1.6

4.16 ± 2.8

2.5 ± 0.7

0,12

FSH (mIU/ml)

5.72 ± 2.16

4.9 ± 1.75

3.23 ± 1.86

0,04

If P < 0.05 in chi-square test it is accepted as statistically significant.

Table 2

Genotype and Allele Frequencies of the PRP PROGINS Polymorphism in Women With PCOS And Healthy Controls

PRPs

PCOS Patients (n= 95)

Control Groups (n = 99)

Genotypes

  

T1/T1

71 (74.7%)

67 (67.7%)

T1/T2

21 (22.1%)

28 (28.3%)

T2/T2

3 (3.2%)

4 (3.6%)

T1/T2 + T2/T2

24 (25.3%)

32 (31.9%)

Alleles

  

T1

163 (85.8%)

162 (81.8%)

T2

27 (14.2%)

36 (18.2%)

n, number of patients who could be genotyped successfully.

Discussion

The importance of this study is working on progesterone receptor polymorphism and searching the effects of this polymorphism on the Oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers and CIMT of the PCOS patients for whom the gynaecological malignancies show increases. Progesterone and estrogen are the main steroid hormones involved in normal reproduction functions. An abnormality may also occur in PGR receptor except for the progesterone itself. Several polymorphisms have been identified in PGR; they include S344T, G393G, V660L, H770H, and the PROGINS allele [23, 24]. The physiological effects of progesterone are completely dependent on the presence of the human PGR, a member of the steroid-receptor superfamily of nuclear receptors [25]. As a consequence of this receptor, PROGINS encodes for a receptor protein with increased stability and increased hormone-induced transcriptional activity [26]. Functional polymorphisms in genes involved in proliferation and cellular homeostasis may affect the risk for benign and malignant disorders.

Inflammation and progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS)

Chronic inflammation has been associated with a risk of atherosclerosis and cancer development. In previously studies have reported an endothelial dysfunction in women with PCOS [27, 28]. Accumulating evidence also suggests that atherosclerosis represents a chronic inflammatory process and inflammatory markers like CRP and fibrinogen, homocysteine provide an adjunctive method for global assessment of cardiovascular risk [29, 30].

Recent data also suggest that hs-CRP may directly promote endothelial dysfunction by increasing the synthesis of soluble adhesion molecules, increasing monocyte chemoattractant protein secretion [31, 32]. As a result of this study; no difference has been detected on different genotypes of functional progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS) according to hs-CRP and fibrinogen proinflammatory markers, which are important factors for early atherosclerosis in PCOS.

Insulin resistance and progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS)

The link of PCOS with insulin resistance was subsequently established by clinical studies characterizing the profound insulin resistance in obese and lean PCOS patients. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and beta cell dysfunction are very common in PCOS, but are not required for the diagnosis [33].

In PCOS, stimulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation from mononuclear cells (MNCs) by hyperglycaemia may play a role in inflammation through the release of TNFα from circulating MNCs. The oxidative effects of insulin have been demonstrated in vitro and in response to both physiological and pharmacological insulin infusions in vivo [34, 35]. The estradiol hormone level is high in a menstrual cycle, free radicals produced as a consequence of exercise may be easily removed by inactive women with regular menstrual cycles [36]. In this study no statistically significant difference has been detected according to plasma glucose, estradiol level, insulin levels and HOMA-IR between the PCOS patients with different functional progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS).

Oxidative stress parameters and progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS)

In previously study, did not show a significant correlation between progesterone receptor polymorphism and oxidative system markers in PCOS. It has been reported from experiments in rats that progesterone may also have antioxidant properties in some circumstances [37]. However, these observations have not been reported in humans.

In our study, the Oxidative stress markers have been evaluated in the PCOS patients with progesterone receptor polymorphism (PROGINS). In the presence of inflammation MDA and -SH groups increase but "NO" levels decreases in tissues and blood [38]. Under normal physiological conditions, cellular ROS generation is counterbalanced by the action of antioxidant enzymes and other redox molecules. The balance between O 2 MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacqqGpbWtdaqhaaWcbaGaeGOmaidabaGaeyOeI0caaaaa@2FDD@ generation and elimination is important for maintaining proper cellular redox states. A moderate increase in ROS can stimulate cell growth and proliferation [39]. However, excessive ROS accumulation will lead to cellular injury, such as damage to DNA [40], protein, and lipid membrane [41, 42]. Because of their potential harmful effects, excessive ROS must be promptly eliminated from the cells by a variety of antioxidant defence mechanisms, including important enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and various peroxidases. Compelling evidence suggests that cancer cells are generally under ROS stress [43]. Although the precise mechanisms responsible for increased ROS stress in cancer cells have not be defined, the increase in ROS generation is attributed to active cellular metabolic activity under the influence of oncogenic signals and/or to mitochondrial malfunction in cancer cells [44].

In our study no statistically significant difference has been detected according to NO, MDA and -SH levels in the patient groups with different PROGINS genotype. It is known that cancer risk (breast, endometrial) in PCOS patients is higher than the healthy women. Our patients are young and the period that they encountered negative metabolic differences is shorter. Differences on metabolic parameters CIMT and oxidative stress markers for these genotypes may occur after a time period.

In previous studies coronary calcification, as a risk factor of CVD was found to be significantly increased in patients with PCOS in comparison with healthy controls [45, 46]. In our study no statistically significant difference has been detected according to f-testosteron, total testosteron and estrogen levels in the patient groups with different PROGINS genotype.

As a result no relation has been detected between the inflammatory and oxidative stress factors, and PROGINS polymorphism alells. This may be because the patients are young and their BMI means are normal and their CIMT and oxidative stress markers are like healthy women. In the future we planned to study on older PCOS patients and evaluate these parameters for this group.

Abbreviations

PCOS: 

polycystic ovary syndrome

BMI: 

body mass index

CI: 

confidence interval

CV: 

coefficient(s) of variation

MLRA: 

Multipl Logistic Regression Analysis

CVD: 

cardiovascular disease

DHEAS: 

dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate

E2-17ß: 

estradiol

Hcy: 

homocysteine

17-OHP: 

17-hydroxyprogesterone

P: 

progesterone

PRL: 

prolactin

T: 

testosterone

CIMT: 

Carotid intima-media thickness

BMI: 

body mass index

FSH: 

follicle stimulating hormone

LH: 

luteinising hormone

HOMA-IR: 

homeostasis model of assessment insulin resistance

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Hatice Uluer for her assistance with the statistical evaluation of this study, and the Biofarma Medicine Company for their support.

In addition we are thankful to Nail Tartaroğlu Endocrinology and Metabolism Laboratory technicians for their technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Internal Disease, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ege University
(2)
Division of Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Ege University
(3)
Division of Radiology, Ege University

References

  1. Chang RJ: A practical approach to the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 191 (3): 713-7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Legro RS: Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiovascular disease: a premature association?. Endocr Rev. 2003, 24: 302-312. 10.1210/er.2003-0004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Spritzer PM, Morsch DM, Wiltgen D: Polycystic ovary syndrome associated neoplasms. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2005, 49 (5): 805-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gadducci A, Gargini A, Palla E, Fanucchi A, Genazzani AR: Polycystic ovary syndrome and gynecological cancers: is there a link?. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005, 20 (4): 200-8. 10.1080/09513590400021201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balen A: Polycystic ovary syndrome and cancer. Hum Reprod Update. 2001, 7 (6): 522-5. 10.1093/humupd/7.6.522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donaldson CJ, Crapanzano JP, Watson JC, Levine EA, Batzer MA: PROGINS Alu insertion and human genomic diversity. Mutat Res. 2002, 25;501 (1–2): 137-41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rousseau Merck MF, Misrahi M, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E, Berger R: Localization of the human progesterone receptor gene to chromosome 11q22-q23. Hum Genet. 1987, 77: 280-282. 10.1007/BF00284486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Punyadeera C, Verbost P, Groothuis P: Oestrogen and progestin responses in human endometrium. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003, 84 (4): 393-410. 10.1016/S0960-0760(03)00061-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, Press MF: Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev. 1993, 15: 17-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A, Singh HR, Olson LK, Gatewood O, Bassett LW, Wasilauskas C, Bush T, Barrett-Connor E: Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med. 1999, 130: 262-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McKenna NJ, Kieback DG, Carney DN, Fanning M, McLinden J, Headon DR: A germline TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphismin the progesterone receptor gene in ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1995, 71: 451-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lancaster JM, Berchuck A, Carney ME, Wiseman R, Taylor JA: Progesterone receptor gene polymorphism and risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998, 78: 277.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lancaster JM, Wenham RM, Halabi S, Calingaert B, Marks JR, Moorman PG, Bentley RC, Berchuck A, Schildkraut JM: No relationship between ovarian cancer risk and progesterone receptor gene polymorphism in a population-based, case-control study in North Carolina. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003, 12: 226-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabjani G, Tong D, Czerwenka K, Schuster E, Speiser P, Zeillinger R: Human progesterone receptor gene polymorphism PROGINS and risk for breast cancer in Austrian women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002, 72: 131-7. 10.1023/A:1014813931765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brooks-Asplund EM, Tupper CE, Daun JM, Kenney WL, Cannon JG: Hormonal modulation of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor and associated receptor secretion in postmenopausal women. Cytokine. 2002, 19: 193-200. 10.1006/cyto.2002.1963.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Manning PJ, Sutherland WH, Allum AR, de Jong SA, Jones SD: Effect of hormone replacement therapy on inflammation-sensitive proteins in post-menopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2002, 19: 847-852. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00808.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group: Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004, 19 (1): 41-7. 10.1093/humrep/deh098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferriman D, Gallwey JD: Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1961, 21: 1440-1447.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985, 28: 412-419. 10.1007/BF00280883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yagi K: Lipid peroxides in hepatic, gastrointestinal and pancreatic diseases. Free radicals in Diagnostic Medicine. Edited by: Armstrong D. 1994, New York, NY, Plenum Press, 165-169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA: A rapid, simple spectrophometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide. 2001, 5: 62-71. 10.1006/niox.2000.0319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sedlak J, Lindsay RH: Estimation of total, protein-bound and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman's reagent. Anal Biochem. 1968, 25: 192-205. 10.1016/0003-2697(68)90092-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Risch HA, Bale AE, Beck PA, Zheng W: PGR +331 A/G and increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkers Prev. 2006, 15 (9): 1738-41. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0272.Google Scholar
  24. Lau KM, Mok SC, Ho SM: Expression of human estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in normal and malignant ovarian epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 5722-7. 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5722.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowe SM, Coughlan SJ, McKenna NJ, Garrett E, Kieback DG, Carney DN, Headon DR: Ovarian carcinoma-associated TaqI restriction fragment length polymorphism in intron G of the progesterone receptor gene is due to an Alu sequence insertion. Cancer Res. 1995, 1;55 (13): 2743-5.Google Scholar
  26. Agoulnik IU, Tong XW, Fischer DC, Korner K, Atkinson NE, Edwards DP, Headon DR, Weigel NL, Kieback DG: A germline variation in the progesterone receptor gene increases transcriptional activity and may modify ovarian cancer risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89 (12): 6340-7. 10.1210/jc.2004-0114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohshima H, Tatemichi M, Sawa T: Chemical basis of inflammation-induced carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 417 (1): 3-11. 10.1016/S0003-9861(03)00283-2. 2003 Sep 1Google Scholar
  28. Hofseth LJ, Wargovich MJ: Inflammation, cancer, and targets of ginseng. J Nutr. 2007, 137 (1): 183S-5S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bickerton AS, Clark N, Meeking D, Shaw KM, Crook M, Lumb P, Turner C, Cummings MH: Cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). J Clin Pathol. 2005, 58 (2): 151-4. 10.1136/jcp.2003.015271.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Refsum H, Ueland PM, Nygard O, Vollset SE: Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Med. 1998, 49: 31-62. 10.1146/annurev.med.49.1.31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacobsen DW: Homocysteine and vitamins in cardiovascular disease. Clin Chem. 1998, 44: 1833-1843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Deepa R, Velmurugan K, Arvind K, Sivaram P, Sientay C, Uday S, Mohan V: Serum levels of interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in relation to insulin resistance and glucose intolerance – the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES). Metabolism. 2006, 55 (9): 1232-8. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.05.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Diamanti-Kandarakis E: Insulin resistance in PCOS. Endocrine. 2006, 30 (1): 13-7. 10.1385/ENDO:30:1:13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rifici VA, Schneider SH, Khachadurian AK: Stimulation of low-density lipoprotein oxidation by insulin and insulin like growth factor I. Atherosclerosis. 1994, 107: 99-108. 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90145-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Quiñones Galvan A, Muscelli E, Catalano C, Natali A, Sanna G, Masoni A, Bernardini B, Barsacchi R, Ferrannini E: Insulin decreases circulating vitamin E levels in humans. Metabolism. 1996, 45: 998-1003. 10.1016/S0026-0495(96)90270-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Joo MH, Maehata E, Adachi T, Ishida A, Murai F, Mesaki N: The relationship between exercise-induced oxidative stress and the menstrual cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004, 93 (1–2): 82-6. 10.1007/s00421-004-1168-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. O MH, Maehata E, Adachi T, Ishida A, Murai F, Mesaki N: The relationship between exercise-induced oxidative stress and the menstrual cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004, 93 (1–2): 82-6.Google Scholar
  38. Bhatia S, Shukla R, Venkata Madhu S, Kaur Gambhir J, Madhava Prabhu K: Antioxidant status, lipid peroxidation and nitric oxide end products in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus with nephropathy. Clin Biochem. 2003, 36 (7): 557-62. 10.1016/S0009-9120(03)00094-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicotera TM, Privalle C, Wang TC, Oshimura M, Barrett JC: Differential proliferative responses of Syrian hamster embryo fibroblasts to paraquat-generated superoxide radicals depending on tumor suppressor gene function. Cancer Res. 1994, 15;54 (14): 3884-8.Google Scholar
  40. Murrell GA, Francis MJ, Bromley L: Modulation of fibroblast proliferation by oxygen free radicals. Biochem J. 1990, 1;265 (3): 659-65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Randerath K, Randerath E, Smith CV, Chang J: Structural origins of bulky oxidative DNA adducts (type II I-compounds) as deduced by oxidation of oligonucleotides of known sequence. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996, 9 (1): 247-54. 10.1021/tx950085v.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Toyokuni S, Okamoto K, Yodoi J, Hiai H: Persistent oxidative stress in cancer. FEBS Lett. 1995, 16;358 (1): 1-3. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01368-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Pelicano H, Carney D, Huang P: ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications. Drug Resist Updat. 2004, 7 (2): 97-110. 10.1016/j.drup.2004.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsai JC, Perrella MA, Yoshizumi M, Hsieh CM, Haber E, Schlegel R, Lee ME: Promotion of vascular smooth muscle cell growth by homocysteine: a link to atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 6369-6373. 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6369.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wild RA, Applebaum-Bowden D, Demers LM, Bartholomew M, Landis JR, Hazzard WR, Santen RJ: Lipoprotein lipids in women with androgen excess: independent associations with increased insulin andandrogen. Clin Chem. 1990, 36 (2): 283-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Alexandraki K, Protogerou AD, Papaioannou TG, Piperi C, Mastorakos Gw, Lekakis J, Panidis D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E: Early microvascular and macrovascular dysfunction is not accompanied by structural arterial injury in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hormones (Athens). 2006, 5 (2): 126-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Karadeniz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement