Angiotensin II type 1 and type 2 receptor expression in circulating monocytes of diabetic and hypercholesterolemic patients over 3-month rosuvastatin treatment
© Marino et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 September 2012
Accepted: 18 December 2012
Published: 22 December 2012
In diabetes, a variety of pro-inflammatory cellular changes has been found in various cell types, including monocytes which are known to be involved in all the phases of atherogenesis. Angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor (AT1R) mediates the pro-atherogenic effects of Ang II whereas the type 2 receptor (AT2R) seems associated with atheroprotection. We sought to investigate the potential changes of AT1R-AT2R expression in human monocytes of type 2 diabetic- hypercholesterolemic patients and in hypercholesterolemic subjects, upon clinical treatment with rosuvastatin.
The AT1R membrane protein and mRNA AT1R and AT2R expression in monocytes were investigated in 10 type 2 diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients and in 10 hypercholesterolemic subjects, before and after 3-month rosuvastatin treatment. Moreover, the serum cytokine levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) were detected.
As expected, rosuvastatin was associated with a change in the lipid profile in the two groups. Both the membrane protein (P = 0.008) and the AT1R mRNA expression (P = 0.038) were significantly reduced during treatment in the absence of AT2R expression change in diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients whereas no significant difference was observed in hypercholesterolemic subjects. The serum IL-4 levels were increased during treatment whereas no change was observed in IFN-γ in diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients. No cytokine change was observed in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
Our study on monocytes of diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients, showing a reduced AT1R but not AT2R expression during rosuvastatin treatment, suggests that statin therapy may modulate favorably the AT1-AT2 receptor balance in subjects with coexistent type 2 diabetes.
KeywordsType 2 Diabetes Angiotensin II type 1 receptor Angiotensin II type 2 receptor Monocytes Statin
Results from clinical trials show that systemic markers of inflammation correlate considerably with future cardiovascular events, both at baseline and during pharmacological treatments. Atherosclerosis as an immuno-inflammatory disease has been associated with a prevalent T-helper (Th) 1 response, being the Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) a key cytokine for pro-inflammatory response amplification; although controversial, data support an antiatherogenic effect of Th2 responses, and Interleukin (IL)-4, the prototypic Th2-related cytokine, is generally considered as an anti-inflammatory cytokine. The renin-angiotensin-system has been strongly implicated in atherogenesis-related pro-inflammatory events. Angiotensin II (Ang II) exerts its effects through the binding of two major receptors: the Ang II type-1 receptor (AT1R) which mediates the majority of the pro-atherogenic well-known Ang II actions and type-2 receptor (AT2R) that is considered counteracting the AT1R-mediated effects. Recently a direct role of AT1R activation in leukocyte and macrophages has been identified in the persistence and/or amplification of microinflammation in vessel walls[4, 5]. Although little is known at present about the involvement of AT2Rs in atherosclerosis, these receptors appear to participate importantly in vascular biology with improvement in resistance artery remodeling and appear to be cardioprotective[6–8].
The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is increased 2- to 3-fold in type 2 diabetes mellitus and a recent meta-analysis in diabetic patients further strengthens the need of a clinical use of statins in this patient population, irrespectively from the baseline lipid characteristics of the patients. Statins may interfere at various levels with the inflammatory processes leading to atherosclerosis and recent evidence, pointing to an interaction between statins and immune function, showed that isoprenoids could regulate T cell proliferation and Th1 differentiation[10, 11]. Moreover, the effects of statins seem to influence pathways leading to Ang II-mediated atherosclerosis and we previously demonstrated, in circulating neutrophils of high-cardiovascular risk patients, interferences of treatment on both AT1R expression and the cell membrane translocation Rac 1, a guanosine triphosphate–binding protein playing a key role in Ang II–operated signaling pathways.
Among the circulating immune cells, monocytes are the most studied cell subset in relation to atherosclerosis and a key role of these cells in all the phases of atherogenesis has been demonstrated. Monocytes are the primary immune cells that appear early on the endothelial layer and adhere to the arterial endothelium and, after migrating into the intima and accumulating in fatty streaks, contribute to their differentiation into macrophages which produce inflammatory cytokines, stimulate smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration and produce proteolytic enzymes that render the growing plaque more susceptible to rupture. In the attempt to dissect the pathophysiological aspects and causalities of atherosclerosis and the potential effects of pharmacological treatments, it is worth focusing on cellular and subcellular pro-atherogenetic changes associated with atherosclerosis and their modulation by drugs. However, most of the reported studies on the so-called pleiotropic effects of statins have been performed in vitro or in animal models of atherosclerosis[14, 15] and only very few studies are available on cellular effects of clinically administered statin treatment in humans. Recently a word of caution has been raised on the basis of the notion that the various mouse models in use for studying atherosclerosis differ noticeably in their response to pharmacological modifiers of atherogenesis and differences in anatomy, lipid metabolism, and gene expression complicate translation of experimental results obtained in mice to humans.
Moreover, a challenge of the human cellular studies in atherosclerosis relies on the evidence that atherosclerosis is a highly heterogeneous condition. To minimize this limitation of human studies, we focused on diabetic patients who did not show clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis, such as healthy subjects with pre-clinical and early pro-atherogenous changes. We have previously demonstrated that polymorphonuclear cells and monocytes obtained from high-risk subjects express more AT1R than monocytes from healthy donors[17–19]. In the present study we sought to investigate whether rosuvastatin treatment in diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients could be associated with a greater modulation of AT1R and AT2R expression in monocytes than in only hypercholesterolemic subjects treated with rosuvastatin. Moreover, we investigated whether the statin treatment could interfere with Th1/Th2 profile as expressed by the measure of serum IFN-γ and IL-4 levels.
Patients and methods
Design of the study
In 10 subjects with type 2 diabetes and hypercholesterolemia (DM), and in 10 hypercholesterolemic (HC) subjects, monocytes were isolated from venous blood to investigate the AT1R and AT2R expression; moreover serum was also collected to measure cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-4) (see below). Patients were studied: 1] before any pharmacological treatment and 2] after 3- month treatment with rosuvastatin (10 mg/day; 10 PM). The subjects were enrolled consecutively at our Lipid Clinic (Research Center on Dyslipidemia, Clinical Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy) coming from the Diabetic Unit or General Practitioner for evaluation of dyslipidemia. As for inclusion criteria to be enrolled in this study, no disease was found after a clinical examination and routine laboratory tests (apart from diabetes), and the patients did not assume any pharmacological treatment except for anti-diabetic treatment. Anti-diabetic medications were allowed if the patients were satisfactorily treated and no changes in treatment were scheduled for the duration of the study. Eight patients were on diet treatment, 1 assumed metformin and 1 patient was on treatment with the association glybenclamide/metformin. Ongoing clinical infection and/or the presence of infections in the previous three months as well as a smoking habitus and competitive sporting activities were exclusion criteria. All the patients had previously been instructed about the life-style modification required for the treatment of their disease, including dietary treatment (qualitative counseling) and mild physical activity. The patients were then asked to maintain the same level of physical activity and a similar diet throughout the study. All the patients were evaluated with a clinical visit including familial and personal history. Among the diabetic-hypercholesterolemic patients studied, 8 were males, mean age was 68 ± 8 years whereas among hypercholesterolemic subjects mean age was 65 ± 10 years. The body-mass-index (28.4 ± 2.7 and 27.4 ± 2.8 Kg/m2) and waist circumference (102.6 ± 10.4 and 99 ± 10cm) were similar respectively in diabetic and hypercholesterolemic patients and the values did not change throughout the study. Blood samples were obtained to perform routine laboratory exams and to isolate circulating monocytes for subsequent studies and to measure serum cytokines by using heparinized tubes between 8.00 and 9.00 A.M., after a night of fasting. Glomerular filtration rate was measured according to MDRD formula. All the subjects were previously asked not to take coffees, teas, chocolates, or cola-containing substances for the 24 hours preceding the evaluations. Our study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki; the local Ethics Committee has approved the research protocol and informed consent has been obtained from the subjects.
Whole blood was allowed to sediment on dextran at 37°C for 30 min. Supernatant was recovered and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated by Ficoll-Paque Plus density-gradient centrifugation. A typical PBMC preparation contained about 80% lymphocytes and 16% monocytes, and cell viability was always >99% as assessed by flow cytometric analysis.
Monocytes (for real-time evaluation) were further separated from PBMCs by immunomagnetic cell sorting. To this end, antibodies targeted to CD14 (monocytes) were obtained from Dynal A.S. (Oslo, Norway) and added to separate aliquots of the cell suspension using a target-to-bead ratio of 1:4 as previously described.
Flow cytometric analysis of AT1R expression
We have evaluated the expression of AT1Rs on the cell membrane of monocytes. To this end, 1 ml of whole blood was used and the analysis was performed by using conventional immunofluorescence techniques together with a multiparametric flow cytometric analysis as previously described. A minimum of 50.000 cells were analyzed from each sample, and AT1R density on positive cells [mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)] was obtained.
RNA isolation and real-time polymerase chair reaction (PCR) analysis of AT1R and AT2R mRNA
Total mRNA was extracted from 1x106 monocytic cells by Perfect RNA Eukaryotic Mini kit (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and the amount of extracted RNA was estimated by spectrophotometry at 260 nm. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the high-capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Real-time-Protein Chain Reaction primers
IMAGE clone ID
AT 1 R
AT 2 R
Threshold cycle values (Ct1) for the genes of interest were calculated, normalized to 18s RNA (Ct2) (housekeeping) content and finally expressed as 2-ΔCt, where ΔCt = Ct2 - Ct1.
Measurement of serum cytokines
Serum samples collected were analysed for cytokine content. To this end, IFN-γ, IL-4 levels in serum were quantified using a sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA kit; Amersham Biosciences, UK). The detection limit of the assay was 1 pg/ml. The control values for serum IL-4 levels were: not detectable; and the serum control IFN-γ levels were: 0–1.5 pg/ml, as reported for the kit used.
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A paired t test was used to compare variables before and during pharmacological statin treatment. Calculations were performed using a commercial software (GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, http://www.graphpad.com) and a two-sided P < 0.05 was retained for statistical significance.
Laboratory characteristics of patients at baseline and after three-month rosuvastatin therapy
Diabetic patients (n = 10)
Hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 10)
223.7 ± 34.0
168.5 ± 45.9
288.2 ± 41.0
165.5 ± 24.4
165.3 ± 73.0
118.5 ± 31.5
180.9 ± 61.4
133.5 ± 58.9
50.0 ± 2.8
50.2 ± 6.5
55.1 ± 9.9
50.7 ± 12.1
135.7 ± 20.6
85.0 ± 25.6
197.0 ± 34.1
88.1 ± 25.1
128.0 ± 53.0
163.0 ± 14.4
144.5 ± 28.5
160.1 ± 55.4
117.2 ± 29.1
54.0 ± 14.9
147.1 ± 38.8
75.1 ± 24.6
137.7 ± 19.4
135.5 ± 31.8
98.6 ± 5.7
97.0 ± 12.9
14.2 ± 3.4
16.3 ± 3.5
18.8 ± 14.7
19.7 ± 17.0
24.2 ± 4.3
24.0 ± 4.1
18.3 ± 5.6
17.1 ± 3.5
37.7 ± 19.2
39.2 ± 27.1
27.6 ± 12.9
21.3 ± 4.4
43.3 ± 27.2
46.5 ± 39.6
21.7 ± 5.9
20.1 ± 5.6
212.7 ± 103.5
135.7 ± 64.9
134.4 ± 56.6
0.98 ± 0.11
0.97 ± 0.10
0.98 ± 0.17
0.99 ± 0.18
76.33 ± 12.18
77.5 ± 3.56
73.22 ± 33.31
74.00 ± 12.09
2.94 ± 2.02
1.76 ± 0.51
1.70 ± 1.69
1.15 ± 0.79
Flow cytometric analysis of AT1R expression
AT1R and AT2R mRNA expression in monocytes from patients before and after rosuvastatin treatment
Serum cytokine levels from patients before and after rosuvastatin treatment
Rosuvastatin treatment did not affect serum levels of IFN-γ (7.97 ± 2.41 pg/ml vs 6.45 ± 3.35 pg/ml; P = 0.912). A significant increase of IL-4 was observed after three months of statin treatment (22.96 ± 16.53 pg/ml vs 35.10 ± 16.93 pg/ml; P = 0.020). No cytokine change was observed in hypercholesterolemic subjects.
The main finding of the present study is the observation that medium-term rosuvastatin clinical treatment is associated with reduced AT1R expression in monocytes of type 2 diabetic patients in the absence of AT2R expression changes.
Various factors act in diabetes to induce atherosclerotic processes and vascular changes. Both hyperinsulinemia and the lipid pattern called atherogenic dyslipidemia are well known pro-atherogenic factors. Recently, the central role of inflammation in diabetes-related atherosclerosis has been underlined by the finding that pro-inflammatory preconditioning is required for the development of high-glucose-induced inflammation in human aortic smooth muscle cells. Moreover, altered cellular functions of various cell types have been related to diabetes and these abnormalities may contribute to systemic inflammation. In particular, in experimental models of diabetes monocytes/macrophages show a decreased phagocytosis and an increased expression of inflammatory mediators, and cells from diabetic subjects exhibit enhanced adherence to the endothelium. As regards the Ang II receptor expression, the functional relevance of up-regulated AT1R expression in diabetes has been underlined by a recent study showing that upregulation of the ligand–Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products pathway via AT1R is an essential mechanism in diabetic atherosclerosis. In diabetic myocardium a significant increase in protein expression and median mRNA expression of the AT1R was reported. In carotid human specimen the mRNA expression of both angiotensinogen and angiotensin-converting enzyme were higher in type 2 diabetic patients than in non-diabetic subjects whereas AT1R mRNA did not differ. Previously we reported that subjects with increased cardiovascular risk according to the Adults Treatment Panel III guidelines had an increased leukocyte AT1R expression at mRNA level and that this expression was reduced during simvastatin treatment but no study has previously focused on cellular changes upon statin treatment in a specific diabetic population[12, 17]. In this study we did not enrolled a control group since the comparison of the receptor expression of high risk subjects has been already investigated. Moreover, we show here for the first time that not only mRNA, but also protein membrane expression of AT1R was significantly reduced during rosuvastatin treatment.
AT2Rs are present in the vasculature and may induce vasorelaxation in vivo[6–8]. Very few studies are at present published on the AT2R expression and functioning in humans, and it is now generally accepted that the AT1R blockade is associated with AT2R overexpression and that AT2R stimulation by Ang II induces counterregulatory vasodilatation that opposes AT1R–mediated vasoconstriction. Indeed, in a study on resistance arteries dissected from gluteal subcutaneous tissues of hypertensive diabetic patients treated with valsartan, Ang II evoked a significant vasodilatory response which was blocked by an AT2R inhibitor. However, studies performed on human internal mammary arteries, AT2R receptor stimulation did not mediate vasodilation and AT2R-mediated vasodilation in the human heart was shown to be limited to coronary microarteries[29, 30].
To our knowledge, no study is available on both AT1R and AT2R modulation by rosuvastatin. In this study, we show for the first time that, after treatment with rosuvastatin, no changes are observed in AT2R mRNA expression in monocytes of type 2 diabetic patients. This finding strengthens the results of reduced AT1R observed during treatment, suggesting a possible favorable modulation of the AT1-AT2 receptor expression during statin treatment. Moreover, according with the already reported finding of a relatively lower AT2R tissue expression in the adult when compared with AT1R expression, we show in human monocytes of diabetic subjects that the AT2R is expressed at a lower level than AT1R. However we have to acknowledge that the results reported here, obtained in a population mainly constituted by male subjects, apply only to type 2 diabetic patients. Even if we have not recruited a control group, the reduction of AT1 receptor expression after rosuvastatin treatment could be explained by a specific effect of diabetes, given that the two groups didn’t differ in their lipid profile. Moreover, the relatively small number of the patients enrolled in this study or the short-term could have influenced the results in hypercholesterolemic patients.
It has been recently reported that rosuvastatin was able to affect the Th1/Th2 response in humans with acute coronary syndrome. In our study, in subjects prone to atherosclerosis but in a stable phase of the process as the type 2 diabetic patients studied, a significant increase of the Th2-profile-related IL-4 was observed whereas we did not evidence a reduction in circulating IFN-γ during treatment. Previously, a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokine production by circulating monocytes has been associated with statin treatment in humans[32, 33]. As regards statin effects on cytokines directly involved in immunomodulation, although simvastatin-treated dendritic cells showed a Th2 transcription profile which was accompanied by increased Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) and decreased Th1 (IFN-γ) cytokine secretion from the T cells, no longitudinal study in humans has previously shown increased IL-4 levels during clinical statin treatment. Other authors showed no immunomodulatory effect by atorvastatin on the Th1/Th2 balance in human T cells in vitro.
In conclusion, this longitudinal study in humans show that rosuvastatin treatment is associated with reduced monocyte AT1R but not AT2R expression, suggesting that the clinically administered statin therapy may modulate favorably the AT1-AT2 receptor balance in diabetic patients.
- Ang II:
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor
Angiotensin II type 2 receptor
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Mean fluorescence intensity
- Ridker PM: C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49: 2129-2138. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tedgui A, Mallat Z: Cytokines in Atherosclerosis: Pathogenic and Regulatory Pathways. Physiol Rev. 2006, 86: 515-581. 10.1152/physrev.00024.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mogi M, Iwai M, Horiuchi M: Emerging concepts of regulation of angiotensin II receptors: new players and targets for traditional receptors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27: 2532-2539. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.144154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petnehazy T, Stokes KY, Wood KC, Russell J, Granger DN: Role of Blood Cell–Associated AT1 Receptors in the Microvascular Responses to Hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006, 26: 313-318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tone A, Shikata K, Ogawa D, Sasaki S, Nagase R, Sasaki M, Yozai K, Usui HK, Okada S, Wada J, Shikata Y, Makino H: hanges of gene expression profiles in macrophages stimulated by angiotensin II-angiotensin II induces MCP-2 through AT1-receptor. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2007, 8: 45-50. 10.3317/jraas.2007.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Savoia C, Touyz RM, Volpe M, Schiffrin EL: Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor in Resistance Arteries of Type 2 Diabetic Hypertensive Patients. Hypertension. 2007, 49: 341-346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez Schulman I, Zhou MS, Raij L: Cross-Talk Between Angiotensin II Receptor Types 1 and 2. Hypertension. 2007, 49 (Hernandez Schulman I, Zhou MS, Raij L): 270-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carey RM: Cardiovascular and Renal Regulation by the Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor. The AT2 Receptor Comes of Age. Hypertension. 2005, 45: 840-844. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000159192.93968.8f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators: Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008, 371: 117-125. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60104-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arora M, Chen L, Paglia M, Gallagher I, Allen JE, Vyas YM, Ray A, Ray P: Simvastatin promotes Th2-type responses through the induction of the chitinase family member Ym1 in dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 7777-7782. 10.1073/pnas.0508492103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westerink J, Visseren FLJ: Pharmacological and non pharmacological interventions to influence adipose tissue function. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 13-10.1186/1475-2840-10-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marino F, Guasti L, Cosentino M, Ferrari M, Rasini E, Maio RC, Cimpanelli MG, Cereda E, Crespi C, Simoni C, Restelli D, Venco A, Lecchini S: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in polymorphonuclear leukocytes from high-risk subjects: changes after treatment with simvastatin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007, 49: 299-305. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31803d35ce.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osterud B, Bjorklid E: Role of monocytes in atherogenesis. Physiol Rev. 2003, 83: 1069-1112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giunti S, Calkin AC, Forbes JM, Allen TJ, Thomas MC, Cooper ME, Jandeleit-Dahm KA: The pleiotropic actions of rosuvastatin confer renal benefits in the diabetic Apo-E knockout mouse. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010, 299: F528-F535. 10.1152/ajprenal.00127.2010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zoja C, Corna D, Gagliardini E, Conti S, Arnaboldi L, Benigni A, Remuzzi G: Adding a statin to a combination of ACE inhibitor and ARB normalizes proteinuria in experimental diabetes, which translates into full renoprotection. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010, 299: F1203-F1211. 10.1152/ajprenal.00045.2010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zadelaar S, Kleemann R, Verschuren L, De Vries-Van Der Weij J, Van der Hoorn J, Princen HM, Kooistra T: Mouse Models for Atherosclerosis and Pharmaceutical Modifiers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27: 1706-1721. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.142570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marino F, Guasti L, Cosentino M, Rasini E, Ferrari M, Maio RC, Loraschi A, Cimpanelli MG, Schembri L, Legnaro M, Molteni E, Crespi C, Crema F, Venco A, Lecchini S: Simvastatin treatment in subjects at high cardiovascular risk modulates AT1R expression on circulating monocytes and T lymphocytes. J Hypertens. 2008, 26: 1147-1155. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f97dde.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guasti L, Marino F, Cosentino M, Cimpanelli M, Maio RC, Klersy C, Crespi C, Restelli D, Simoni C, Franzetti I, Gaudio G, Marnini P, Grandi AM, Lecchini S, Venco A: Simvastatin treatment modifies polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in high-risk individuals: a longitudinal study. J Hypertens. 2006, 24: 2423-2430. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000251903.62804.77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guasti L, Marino F, Cosentino M, Maio RC, Rasini E, Ferrari M, Castiglioni L, Klersy C, Gaudio G, Grandi AM, Lecchini S, Venco A: Prolonged statin-associated reduction in neutrophil reactive oxygen species and angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression: 1-year follow-up. Eur Heart J. 2008, 29 (9): 1118-1126. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klahr S, Levey AS, Beck GJ, Caggiula AW, Hunsicker L, Kusek JW, Striker G: For the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group: The effects of dietary protein restriction and bloodpressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 877-884. 10.1056/NEJM199403313301301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasini E, Cosentino M, Marino F, Legnaro M, Ferrari M, Guasti L, Venco A, Lecchini S: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression on human leukocyte subsets: a flow cytometric and RT-PCR study. Regul Pept. 2006, 134: 69-74. 10.1016/j.regpep.2006.01.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grundy SM: Metabolic syndrome: connecting and reconciling cardiovascular and diabetes worlds. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 47: 1093-1100. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.046.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lafuente N, Matesanz N, Azcutia V, Romacho T, Nevado J, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Moncada S, Peiró C, Sánchez-Ferrer CF: The deleterious effect of high concentrations of D-glucose requires pro-inflammatory preconditioning. J Hypertens. 2008, 26: 478-485. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f331fb.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang CP, Han S, Senokuchi T, Tall AR: The Macrophage at the Crossroads of Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2007, 100: 1546-1555. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.152165.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ihara Y, Egashira K, Nakano K, Ohtani K, Kubo M, Koga J, Iwai M, Horiuchi M, Gang Z, Yamagishi S, Sunagawa K: Upregulation of the ligand-RAGE pathway via the angiotensin II type I receptor is essential in the pathogenesis of diabetic atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007, 43: 455-464. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.07.044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reuter H, Adam C, Grönke S, Zobel C, Frank KF, Müller-Ehmsen J, Brabender J, Schwinger RH: The increased angiotensin II (type 1) receptor density in myocardium of type 2 diabetic patients is prevented by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 3067-3074. 10.1007/s00125-006-0444-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hodroj W, Legedz L, Foudi N, Cerutti C, Bourdillon MC, Feugier P, Beylot M, Randon J, Bricca G: Increased insulin-stimulated expression of arterial angiotensinogen and angiotensin type 1 receptor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atheroma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007, 27: 525-531. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000254814.63768.3b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carey RM: Angiotensin Receptors and Aging. Hypertension. 2007, 50: 33-34. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.106.086587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van de Wal RM, van der Harst P, Wagenaar LJ, Wassmann S, Morshuis WJ, Nickenig G, Buikema H, Plokker HW, van Veldhuisen DJ, van Gilst WH, Voors AA: Angiotensin II type 2 receptor vasoactivity in internal mammary arteries of patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2007, 50: 372-379. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31811ea222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Batenburg WW, Garrelds IM, Bernasconi CC, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, van Kats JP, Saxena PR, Danser AH: Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in human coronary microarteries. Circulation. 2004, 109: 2296-2301. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128696.12245.57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Link A, Ayadhi T, Böhm M, Nickenig G: Rapid immunomodulation by rosuvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2006, 27: 2945-2955. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rezaie-Majd A, Maca T, Bucek RA, Valent P, Müller MR, Husslein P, Kashanipour A, Minar E, Baghestanian M: Simvastatin reduces expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002, 22: 1194-1199. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000022694.16328.CC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Devaraj S, Chan E, Jialal I: Direct demonstration of an antiinflammatory effect of simvastatin in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 4489-4496. 10.1210/jc.2006-0299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coward W, Chow SC: Effect of atorvastatin on Th1 and Th2 cytokine secreting cells during T cell activation and differentiation. Atherosclerosis. 2006, 186: 302-309. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.