Associations of the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes are modulated by diet, being higher when adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern is low

  • Carolina Ortega-Azorín1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Jose V Sorlí1, 2,

      Affiliated with

      • Eva M Asensio1, 2,

        Affiliated with

        • Oscar Coltell2, 3, 4,

          Affiliated with

          • Miguel Ángel Martínez-González5,

            Affiliated with

            • Jordi Salas-Salvadó2, 6,

              Affiliated with

              • Maria-Isabel Covas2, 7,

                Affiliated with

                • Fernando Arós8,

                  Affiliated with

                  • José Lapetra2, 9,

                    Affiliated with

                    • Lluís Serra-Majem10,

                      Affiliated with

                      • Enrique Gómez-Gracia11,

                        Affiliated with

                        • Miquel Fiol2, 12,

                          Affiliated with

                          • Guillermo Sáez-Tormo13,

                            Affiliated with

                            • Xavier Pintó14,

                              Affiliated with

                              • Miguel Angel Muñoz15,

                                Affiliated with

                                • Emilio Ros2, 16,

                                  Affiliated with

                                  • Jose M Ordovás4, 17, 18,

                                    Affiliated with

                                    • Ramon Estruch2, 19 and

                                      Affiliated with

                                      • Dolores Corella1, 2, 4, 20Email author

                                        Affiliated with

                                        Contributed equally
                                        Cardiovascular Diabetology201211:137

                                        DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-137

                                        Received: 29 September 2012

                                        Accepted: 1 November 2012

                                        Published: 6 November 2012

                                        Abstract

                                        Background

                                        Although the Fat Mass and Obesity (FTO) and Melanocortin-4 Receptor (MC4R) genes have been consistently associated with obesity risk, the association between the obesity-risk alleles with type 2 diabetes is still controversial. In some recent meta-analyses in which significant results have been reported, the associations disappeared after adjustment for body mass index (BMI). However gene-diet interactions with dietary patterns have not been investigated. Our main aim was to analyze whether these associations are modulated by the level of adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet).

                                        Methods

                                        Case-control study in 7,052 high cardiovascular risk subjects (3,430 type 2 diabetes cases and 3,622 non-diabetic subjects) with no differences in BMI. Diet was assessed by validated questionnaires. FTO-rs9939609 and MC4R-rs17782313 were determined. An aggregate genetic score was calculated to test additive effects. Gene-diet interactions were analyzed.

                                        Results

                                        Neither of the polymorphisms was associated with type 2 diabetes in the whole population. However, we found consistent gene-diet interactions with adherence to the MedDiet both for the FTO- rs9939609 (P-interaction=0.039), the MC4R-rs17782313 (P-interaction=0.009) and for their aggregate score (P-interaction=0.006). When adherence to the MedDiet was low, carriers of the variant alleles had higher type 2 diabetes risk (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.03-1.40; P=0.019 for FTO- rs9939609 and OR=1.17, 95%CI:1.01-1.36; P=0.035 for MC4R-rs17782313) than wild-type subjects. However, when adherence to the MedDiet was high, these associations disappeared (OR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.85-1.16; P=0.673 for FTO- rs9939609 and OR=0.89, 95%CI:0.78-1.02; P=0.097 for MC4R-rs17782313). These gene-diet interactions remained significant even after adjustment for BMI. As MedDiet is rich in folate, we also specifically examined folate intake and detected statistically significant interaction effects on fasting plasma glucose concentrations in non-diabetic subjects. However these findings should be interpreted with caution because folate intake may simply reflect a healthy dietary pattern.

                                        Conclusions

                                        These novel results suggest that the association of the FTO-rs9939609 and the MC4R-rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes depends on diet and that a high adherence to the MedDiet counteracts the genetic predisposition.

                                        Keywords

                                        Nutrigenetics Mediterranean diet Diabetes FTO MC4R Gene-diet interactions

                                        Background

                                        The Fat Mass and Obesity (FTO) and Melanocortin-4 Receptor (MC4R) genes are considered leading obesity-associated loci [16]. Both genes have been found to be highly expressed in the hypothalamus in rats [7] suggesting a role in a role in the central regulation of energy balance and appetite [7, 8]. Although common variations in these genes have been consistently associated with a higher body mass index (BMI) and obesity risk in numerous individual studies and meta-analyses [16, 912], the association of these variants with a higher type 2 diabetes risk has only recently come to the fore, and is still highly controversial [9, 1324]. Regarding the FTO gene, a recent meta-analysis [13] in East and South Asians, concluded that the FTO rs9939609 minor allele (or a proxy), the risk allele for obesity, increased the risk of type 2 diabetes, this association remaining statistically significant even after adjustment for BMI. Similar results were reported in a Scandinavian population [14]. In contrast, other studies, despite finding a higher type 2 diabetes risk in carriers of the risk-allele for obesity, concluded that this association disappears when adjusting for BMI [1, 2527]. There are also several investigations in which no association with type 2 diabetes was found [6, 9, 2830]. Along these lines, a recent editorial comment [24] stated that it is still unclear whether the FTO is a diabetes-susceptibility gene and further data are needed at this stage, recommending that, in future studies, cases of type 2 diabetes and controls be paired by BMI to better analyze the independent effects on the two outcomes. Regarding the MC4R gene, there are fewer studies that have analyzed the association between the rs17782313 polymorphism (or a proxy) with type 2 diabetes than for the FTO gene, and the results are even less conclusive [2, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 31].

                                        Despite the numerous studies carried out in various populations, it is surprising that none of the above mentioned [131] have specifically examined the influence of the diet modulating the associations of the FTO and the MC4 R risk alleles with type 2 diabetes. The analysis of this modulation is of great importance as it has been reported that mice with increased fto expression did not develop glucose intolerance when fed a standard diet [32]. Interestingly, they developed glucose intolerance on a high fat diet [32]. Likewise, MC4R knockout mice exhibited increased adiposity and hyperinsulinemia and sometimes, depending on diet, developed type 2 diabetes [33]. Every day more importance is placed on the overall food intake pattern on type 2 diabetes [3436] and the traditional MedDiet pattern, low in saturated fat and rich in vegetables, fruits, legumes, fish, nuts and olive oil, reduces type 2 diabetes incidence [3638]. Then, outstanding among the dietary factors that could modulate the effect of the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms on type 2 diabetes, is the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet). Furthermore, the MedDiet is rich in folates [39] and folate availability is crucial for DNA methylation status [40]. Considering that dysregulation in DNA, methylation has been suggested as one relevant epigenetic mechanism in type 2 diabetes [41] and that both the FTO[42] and the MC4R[43] genes are regulated by methylation, the MedDiet might modulate the effect of these genes through epigenetic mechanisms.

                                        As there are no published studies either for the MC4R or for the FTO genes that have analyzed their interactions with MedDiet on type 2 diabetes, our main objective was to evaluate whether adherence to the MedDiet pattern modifies the association of the FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes, either independently or jointly. Our secondary aim was to examine the contribution of folate intake in this interaction.

                                        Methods

                                        Subjects

                                        In a case-control study, we analyzed 7,052 participants (3,430 cases with type 2 diabetes and 3,622 non-diabetic controls) from the PREDIMED (PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea) trial from whom DNA was isolated, the FTO rs9939609 determined, and who had valid data for the main clinical and lifestyle variables analyzed at baseline. These participants did not differ in the main characteristics from those of the total cohort (n=7,447). In 7,019 of them, the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism was successfully determined. The PREDIMED study (http://​www.​predimed.​org) is a multi-center clinical trial aimed at assessing the effects of the MedDiet on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [44, 45]. Participants were recruited between 2003 and 2009 in Primary Care Centers affiliated to 11 recruiting centers (teaching Hospitals) in Spain. They were women (60 to 80 years) or men (55 to 80 years) without prior CVD, with type 2 diabetes (cases) or at least three of the following cardiovascular risk factors in subjects without type 2 diabetes (controls): current smoking, hypertension, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, overweight/obesity, or family history of premature coronary heart disease. The specific cut-off points for these eligibility criteria have been previously described [45]. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to American Diabetes Association criteria [46]. The duration of type 2 diabetes was also recorded. The Institutional Review Board /Ethics Committee of each participating center approved the study protocol. All participants provided written informed consent. The study is registered at http://​www.​controlled-trials.​com/​ISRCTN 35739639.

                                        Clinical, anthropometric and dietary measurements

                                        A general questionnaire was administered at baseline as previously reported [45]. Weight and height were directly measured with calibrated scales and a wall-mounted stadiometer, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters [45]. Registered dietitians completed a validated 14-item MedDiet adherence questionnaire in a face-to-face interview with each participant [47]. This questionnaire consists of 14 questions on the frequency of consumption of specific foods characteristic of the Spanish MedDiet. Each question was scored 0 or 1. One point was given for: 1) using olive oil as the principal source of fat for cooking; 2) preferring white meat over red meat, or for consuming: 1) 4 or more tablespoons of olive oil/d; 2) 2 or more servings of vegetables/d; 3) 3 or more pieces of fruit/d; 4) <1 serving of red meat or sausages/d; 5) <1 serving of animal fat/d; 6) <1 cup of sugar-sweetened beverages/d; 7) 7 or more servings of red wine/wk; 8) 3 or more servings of pulses/wk; 9) 3 or more servings of fish/wk; 10) fewer than 2 commercial pastries/wk; 11) 3 or more servings of nuts/wk; or 12) 2 or more servings/wk of a dish with a traditional sauce of tomatoes, garlic, onion, or leeks sautéed in olive oil. If the condition was not met, 0 points were recorded for the category. The final score ranged from 0 to 14 points. The greater the score obtained from the questionnaire, the greater the adherence to the MedDiet. A dichotomous variable of adherence to the MedDiet was created using as cut-off points the sample mean. In a recent work [48] we have demonstrated the important association of the scores obtained in this questionnaire with obesity phenotypes reinforcing the observation that it is a valid tool that may have a great impact on the genotype-phenotype relationship.

                                        In addition, a 137-item validated food frequency questionnaire [49] was administered to all participants. Energy and nutrient intake were calculated from Spanish food composition tables [50]. Dichotomous variables for nutrient intake were also created using as cut-off points the sample means. Physical activity was estimated by the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire validated in Spain [51].

                                        Biochemical analysis, DNA extraction and genotyping

                                        Blood samples were obtained after an overnight fast. Fasting glucose was measured using standard enzymatic automated methods as previously described [44].

                                        Genomic DNA was extracted from buffy-coat with the MagNaPure LC DNA Isolation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The MC4R rs17782313 and FTO rs9939609 polymorphisms were genotyped on a 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, FosterCity, CA, USA) using fluorescent allelic discrimination TaqManTM assays. The calling rate for both polymorphisms was >95%. For quality control purposes, 5% of samples were randomly selected and genotyped a second time. There were no discrepancies between the two results. Genotype frequencies did not deviate from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations for either polymorphism (P=0.709 for the FTO rs9939609 and P= 0.637 for the MC4R rs17782313).

                                        Statistical analysis

                                        Genetic variables were tested using dominant models of the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms individually. Also, an additive genetic score was created from the two polymorphisms in which the presence of each of the variant alleles for each polymorphism was scored as one point. The range of values of this aggregate score variable varied from 0 to 4 points. As the number of subjects with a score of 4 points was very low, a new score variable (score-grouped) was created grouping the categories of 3 and 4 points. Chi-square tests were used to analyze differences between observed and expected genotype frequencies, assuming Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and to test differences in percentages. We used t-test and ANOVA to compare crude means of continuous variables. Multivariate adjustments for comparisons of continuous variables were carried out by generalized linear models. Multivariable logistic regression methods were used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of the MC4R or FTO polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes and to adjust for confounders. Models were first adjusted for age, sex and center. Additional adjustments for BMI, total energy intake, physical activity, adherence to the MedDiet, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption or education were also carried out as indicated. Dichotomous variables for dietary intake and physical activity were created using as cut-off the sample means. The homogeneity of the effects by sex was also statistically tested using the likelihood ratio test. To examine the interaction between the MC4R rs17782313, the FTO rs9939609 polymorphisms or their score and adherence to the MedDiet, or the other dietary variables, we fitted separate multivariate regression models including the corresponding main effects and interaction terms in addition to the potential confounders. The likelihood ratio test was used to obtain the P values for interactions. Stratified analyses were also carried out. Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS package, version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). All tests were two-tailed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

                                        Results

                                        We studied 3,430 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 3,622 non-diabetic subjects (57% women, mean age 70+/-7 years). Because of the selection criteria, type 2 diabetes cases did not have higher BMI than non-diabetic subjects. Table 1 shows the demographic, biochemical, clinical, lifestyle and genetic characteristics of these participants depending on diabetes status. For the whole sample, mean (±SD) adherence to the MedDiet was 9±2 points on the scale of 0 to 14. We found a small but statistically significant difference (P=0.003) in the mean adherence to the MedDiet depending on the type 2 diabetes status. Duration of type 2 diabetes was as follows: <1 year post-diagnosis (10% of diabetic subjects), 1-5 years (40%) and more than 5 years post-diagnosis (50%). We did not observe significant differences in the mean of adherence to the MedDiet depending on the duration of diabetes (P=0.227), indicating that the pattern of adherence to the MedDiet remains stable regardless of the diabetes diagnostic.
                                        Table 1

                                        Demographic, clinical, lifestyle and genetic characteristics of the study participants at baseline

                                         

                                        Total

                                        No type 2 diabetes

                                        Type 2 diabetes

                                         
                                         

                                        (n=7,052)

                                        (n=3,622)

                                        (n=3,430)

                                         

                                        Mean

                                        (SD)

                                        Mean

                                        (SD)

                                        Mean

                                        (SD)

                                        P

                                        Men/women, n

                                        3008/4044

                                        1382/2240

                                        1626/1804

                                        <0.001

                                        Age (years)

                                        66.9

                                        (6.2)

                                        66.6

                                        (6.1)

                                        67.3

                                        (6.2)

                                        <0.001

                                        Weight (kg)

                                        76.8

                                        (11.9)

                                        76.6

                                        (11.7)

                                        76.9

                                        (12.2)

                                        0.378

                                        BMI (kg/m2)

                                        29.9

                                        (3.8)

                                        30.0

                                        (3.7)

                                        29.9

                                        (4.0)

                                        0.066

                                        Waist circumference (cm)

                                        100.4

                                        (10.6)

                                        99.7

                                        (10.6)

                                        101.2

                                        (10.5)

                                        <0.001

                                        Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

                                        8.7

                                        (1.9)

                                        8.7

                                        (2.1)

                                        8.5

                                        (1.9)

                                        0.003

                                        Energy intake (kcal/d)

                                        2276

                                        (607)

                                        2322

                                        (604)

                                        2228

                                        (607)

                                        <0.001

                                        Total fat (g/d)

                                        98.7

                                        (30.4)

                                        99.1

                                        (29.6)

                                        98.6

                                        (31.3)

                                        0.534

                                        Saturated fat (g/d)

                                        25.4

                                        (9.2)

                                        25.2

                                        (9.0)

                                        25.5

                                        (9.4)

                                        0.155

                                        MUFA (g/d)

                                        48.8

                                        (16.1)

                                        49.2

                                        (15.5)

                                        48.6

                                        (16.6)

                                        0.680

                                        PUFA (g/d)

                                        15.9

                                        (7.0)

                                        15.8

                                        (7.2)

                                        15.9

                                        (7.2)

                                        0.816

                                        Carbohydrates (g/d)

                                        239

                                        (81)

                                        250

                                        (82)

                                        229

                                        (78)

                                        <0.001

                                        Fiber (g/d)

                                        25.7

                                        (9.2)

                                        25.9

                                        (9.3)

                                        25.4

                                        (9.1)

                                        0.063

                                        Alcohol consumption (g/d)

                                        8.4

                                        (14.1)

                                        9.1

                                        (14.7)

                                        7.6

                                        (13.4)

                                        <0.001

                                        Folic acid (microg/d)

                                        406

                                        (127)

                                        407

                                        (125)

                                        406

                                        (129)

                                        0.777

                                        Physical activity* (kcal/d)

                                        230

                                        (239)

                                        225

                                        (226)

                                        237

                                        (253)

                                        0.028

                                        Fasting glucose (mg/dL)**

                                        122.2

                                        (41.0)

                                        98.2

                                        (16.4)

                                        147.3

                                        (45.0)

                                        <0.001

                                        Current smokers (%)

                                        14.1

                                        16.0

                                        12.1

                                         

                                        0.001

                                        Obesity (%)

                                        46.7

                                        47.0

                                        46.4

                                         

                                        0.595

                                        Genotypes (%)

                                        FTO rs9939609

                                        TT

                                        33.0

                                        33.9

                                        32.1

                                         

                                        0.227

                                        TA

                                        48.7

                                        48.3

                                        49.1

                                          

                                        AA

                                        18.3

                                        17.8

                                        18.8

                                          

                                        MC4R rs17782313***

                                        TT

                                        61.8

                                        61.9

                                        61.9

                                         

                                        0.965

                                        TC

                                        33.5

                                        33.4

                                        33.4

                                          

                                        CC

                                        4.7

                                        4.7

                                        4.7

                                          

                                        P: P-value for the comparison between subjects with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetes.

                                        *Leisure time physical activity; **: Fasting glucose data were available for 6232 participants.

                                        ***Genotype data for the MC4R were obtained for 7019 subjects.

                                        BMI: Body mass index; MUFA: Monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids.

                                        We did not observe statistically significant differences in genotype frequencies of the FTO rs9939609 or the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms between subjects with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetic subjects. The aggregate score of these two polymorphisms had a prevalence of 20.6% for zero points (homozygous subjects for non-variant alleles); 40.9% for 1 point (subjects with one variant allele either at FTO or MC4R; 29.2% for 2 points (subjects with two variant alleles), 8.5% for 3 points (subjects with 3 variant alleles) and 0.8% for 4 points (homozygous subjects for the variant alleles both at the FTO and MC4R genes) in the whole sample. We did not detect significant differences for the aggregate score by diabetes status (P=0.640). The FTO polymorphism was significantly associated with higher BMI in carriers of the variant allele (30.1± 3.9 in TA+AA subjects vs 29.8±3.8 kg/m2 in TT; P=0.043), whereas the effect of the MC4R polymorphism did not reach the statistical significance (30.1± 3.9 in TC+CC subjects vs 29.9±3.8 kg/m2 in TT; P=0.187). Likewise, the FTO polymorphism was significantly associated with waist circumference (100.7± 10.4 in TA+AA subjects vs 99.9±10.8 cm in TT; P=0.008) and non-significant differences were observed for the MC4R, although a similar trend was found 100.7± 11.0 in TC+CC subjects vs 100.3±10.4 cm in TT); P=0.137.

                                        Association between the FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes

                                        We did not find (Table 2) any statistically significant association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and type 2 diabetes when analyzing the population as a whole (OR:1.07, 95%CI: 0.97-1.18; P=0.191 for carriers of the FTO obesity risk allele in comparisons with TT homozygotes in model 2). Additional adjustment for BMI did not change the results (model 3). Likewise, there was no association between the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism and type 2 diabetes in the whole sample (OR:1.01, 95%CI: 0.92-1.12; P=0.837 for carriers of the MC4R risk allele in comparison with TT homozygotes. Neither was the aggregate score associated with type 2 diabetes (P=0.572). Additional adjustment for BMI did not change the associations. We observed no heterogeneity by gender (P for interactions >0.05).
                                        Table 2

                                        Association between the FTO , the MC4R polymorphisms and the combined score ( FTO and MC4R ) and type 2 diabetes

                                         

                                        Model 1

                                        Model 2

                                        Model 3

                                        Genetic variants

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        FTO rs9939609 (n=7,052)

                                              

                                        Genotypes

                                              

                                        TT

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        TA+AA

                                        1.08

                                        (0.97-1.19)

                                        1.07

                                        (0.97-1.18)

                                        1.07

                                        (0.97-1.19)

                                         

                                        P=0.147

                                        P=0.191

                                        P=0.181

                                        Variant allele effects**

                                              

                                        (Per A allele)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.99-1.14)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.98-1.13)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.98-1.13)

                                         

                                        P=0.079

                                        P=0.118

                                        P=0.111

                                        MC4 R rs17782313 (n=7,019)

                                              

                                        TT

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        TC+CC

                                        1.01

                                        (0.92-1.12)

                                        1.01

                                        (0.92-1.12)

                                        1.01

                                        (0.91-1.12)

                                         

                                        P=0.832

                                        P=0.837

                                        P=0.845

                                        Variant allele effects**

                                              

                                        (Per C allele)

                                        1.01

                                        (0.93-1.10)

                                        1.01

                                        (0.93-1.09)

                                        1.01

                                        (0.93-1.09)

                                         

                                        P=0.808

                                        P=0.817

                                        P=0.800

                                        Aggregate score ( FTO / MC4R )

                                              

                                        TT and TT (0)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        TA or TC (1)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.93-1.21)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.93-1.20)

                                        1.06

                                        (0.93-1.20)

                                        TA and TC or AA or CC (2)

                                        1.10

                                        (0.96-1.27)

                                        1.10

                                        (0.96-1.27)

                                        1.10

                                        (0.96-1.27)

                                        Otherwise (3 or 4 variants)

                                        1.11

                                        (0.92-1.34)

                                        1.10

                                        (0.90-1.32)

                                        1.10

                                        (0.91-1.33)

                                         

                                        P=0.553

                                        P=0.572

                                        P=0.553

                                        Variant allele effects, score***

                                              

                                        (Per variant allele: 1,2,3,or 4)

                                        1.04

                                        (0.99-1.10)

                                        1.04

                                        (0.98-1.10)

                                        1.04

                                        (0.98-1.09)

                                         

                                        P=0.137 

                                        P=0.183

                                        P=0.169

                                        Multivariate logistic Regression analysis.

                                        Model 1: Adjusted for sex, age and center.

                                        Model 2: Adjusted for sex, age, center, total energy intake and physical activity.

                                        Model 3: Adjusted for sex, age, center, total energy intake, physical activity and BMI.

                                        **: A variable indicating the number of variant alleles (0, 1 or 2) was created for both the FTO and the MC4R.

                                        ***: For the estimation as a score, a variable indicating the number of combined variant alleles was created (0, 1, 2, 3 or 4).

                                        P: P value obtained for the global effect of the polymorphism in the multivariate logistic regression models.

                                        Gene-diet interaction between the FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms and adherence to the MedDiet in determining type 2 diabetes

                                        We found a relevant interaction between adherence to the MedDiet and these polymorphisms in determining type 2 diabetes (Table 3), which was significant both for the FTO (P-interaction=0.039) and for the MC4R (P-interaction=0.009) as well as for their aggregate score (P-interaction=0.006) (Model 1). According to these interactions, the association or not of these polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes depended on the degree of adherence to the MedDiet. When adherence to the MedDiet was low (=<9 points), carriers of the variant allele (obesity-risk allele) had a higher risk of prevalent type 2 diabetes (OR=1.21, 95%CI: 1.03-1.40; P=0.019 for FTO and OR=1.17, 95%CI:1.01-1-36; P=0.035 for MC4R) than homozygous subjects for the major allele. However, when adherence to the MedDiet was high (>=9 points), there was no association of these polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes (OR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.85-1.16; P=0.673 for the FTO and OR=0.89, 95%:0.78-1-02; P=0.097 for the MC4R). These interactions remained statistically significant even after adjustment for BMI (P-interaction= 0.039 for FTO, P-int=0.009 for MC4R and P=0.006 for the aggregate score) (Model 2). Further adjustments for alcohol, tobacco smoking or education did not change the statistical significance of the results (not shown). These polymorphisms had an additive effect in the interaction with MedDiet on type 2 diabetes. So, when the aggregate score was considered as a continuous variable, we also obtained a statistically significant interaction effect (P-interaction=0.024 after adjustment for BMI). When we considered the aggregate genetic score (score-grouped) as a categorical variable, individuals carrying 3 or 4 variant alleles for the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms had 45% higher odds (P=0.009) of prevalent type 2 diabetes (OR: 1.45; 95%CI:1.09-1.92) than subjects with no risk alleles if their adherence to the MedDiet was low. However, when adherence to the MedDiet was high, the higher risk of type 2 diabetes in subjects carrying variant alleles at both the FTO and the MC4R loci, were completely blunted (OR: 0.86; P=0.266).
                                        Table 3

                                        Association between the FTO, the MC4R and the combined score ( FTO and MC4R polymorphisms) and type 2 diabetes

                                         

                                        Model 1

                                         

                                        Model 2

                                         
                                         

                                        Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

                                         

                                        Adherence to the Mediterranean diet

                                         
                                         

                                        Low (<9 points)

                                        High (>=9 points)

                                        P2interaction

                                        Low (<9 points)

                                        High (>=9 points)

                                        P2interaction

                                         

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        Gene x AMD

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        OR

                                        95% CI

                                        Gene x AMD

                                        FTO rs9939609 (n=7,052)

                                            

                                        0.039

                                            

                                        0.039

                                        TT

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        TA + AA

                                        1.21

                                        (1.03-1.40)

                                        0.97

                                        (0.85-1.13)

                                         

                                        1.20

                                        (1.03-1.40)

                                        0.97

                                        (0.85-1.12)

                                         
                                         

                                        P1=0.019

                                        P1=0.673

                                         

                                        P1=0.020

                                        P1=0.743

                                         

                                        MC4R rs17782313 (n=7,019)

                                            

                                        0.009

                                            

                                        0.009

                                        TT

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        TC + CC

                                        1.17

                                        (1.01-1.36)

                                        0.89

                                        (0.78-1.02)

                                         

                                        1.17

                                        (1.01-1.36)

                                        0.89

                                        (0.78-1.02)

                                         
                                         

                                        P1=0.035

                                        P1=0.097

                                         

                                        P1=0.036

                                        P1=0.102

                                         

                                        Aggregate score ( FTO / MC4R )

                                            

                                        0.006

                                            

                                        0.006

                                        TT and TT (0)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                        1.00

                                        (reference)

                                         

                                        TA or TC (1)

                                        1.26

                                        (1.05-1.56)

                                        0.89

                                        (0.75-1.07)

                                         

                                        1.27

                                        (1.06-1.56)

                                        0.89

                                        (0.75-1.07)

                                         

                                        TA and TC or AA or CC (2)

                                        1.29

                                        (1.05-1.59)

                                        0.96

                                        (0.79-1.16)

                                         

                                        1.29

                                        (1.05-1.59)

                                        0.96

                                        (0.79-1.17)

                                         

                                        Otherwise (3 or 4 variants)

                                        1.45

                                        (1.10-1.93)

                                        0.86

                                        (0.66-1.12)

                                         

                                        1.45

                                        (1.09-1.92)

                                        0.87

                                        (0.69-1.13)

                                         
                                         

                                        P1=0.024

                                        P1=0.532

                                         

                                        P1=0.024

                                        P1=0.513

                                         

                                        Variant allele effects**

                                            

                                        0.012

                                            

                                        0.012

                                        (Per variant allele: 1,2,3,or 4)

                                        1.12

                                        (1.03-1.21)

                                        0.97

                                        (0.91-1.05)

                                         

                                        1.12

                                        (1.03-1.21)

                                        0.97

                                        (0.91-1.05)

                                         
                                         

                                        P1=0.005

                                        P1=0.475 

                                         

                                        P1=0.006 

                                        P1=0.532

                                         

                                        Stratified multivariate* logistic regression analysis depending on the adherence to the Mediterranean diet (AMD).

                                        *: Models adjusted for sex, age, center, total energy intake and physical activity (Model 1). Model 2 was additionally adjusted for BMI.

                                        **: For the estimation of the variant allele effect, the score variable indicating the number of combined variant alleles (0, 1, 2 , 3 and 4) was considered as continuous.

                                        P1: P value obtained for the global effect of the polymorphism in the multivariate logistic regression models.

                                        P2: P value for the interaction term between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and the corresponding polymorphism in the logistic regression model.

                                        Furthermore, we adjusted the interaction models for waist circumference instead of BMI. This adjustment in the multivariate model (Model 2) did no change the level of significance of the interactions terms between the polymorphisms and adherence to the Mediterranean diet in determining type 2 diabetes (P-int: 0.034 for FTO, P-int: 0.010 for MC4R and P-int: 0.015 for the aggregate score). Thus, this gene-diet interaction remained statistically significant even adjustment for waist circumference.

                                        Gene-diet interactions between the FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms and folate intake on type 2 diabetes and fasting glucose concentrations

                                        We analyzed the interaction between folate intake (as dichotomous based on the population mean of 406 μg/d) and the polymorphisms on type 2 diabetes, but we did not obtain any statistically significant interaction term (P-interaction=0.203 for the FTO rs9939609, P-interaction=0.745 for the MC4R rs17782313 and P-interaction=0.667). As changes in methylation are very dynamic, we hypothesized a more direct effect of folate intake on fasting glucose concentrations in non-diabetic subjects, as diabetic subjects were taking medication and this could alter the results. We found (Figure 1) a statistically significant interaction (P=0.023) between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and folate intake on fasting glucose concentrations in non-diabetic subjects (Figure 1A). Thus, when folate intake was low, carriers of the variant allele had higher fasting plasma glucose concentrations than wild-type subjects. However, this was not observed when folate intake was high. Although, for the MC4R rs17782313, we found no significant interaction (Figure 1B), on analyzing the joint variable of both polymorphisms, the interaction term reached statistical significance (P=0.026) (Figure 1C). After adjustment of the multivariate interaction models for waist circumference instead of BMI, we did not observe differences in the level of significance of the previously obtained results (P-int: 0.018 for FTO: P-int: 0.627 for MC4R and P-int: 0.021 for the aggregate score.)
                                        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2840-11-137/MediaObjects/12933_2012_Article_542_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                                        Figure 1

                                        Adjusted means of fasting glucose concentrations depending on the FTO rs9939609 (A), MC4R rs17782313 (B) or their grouped aggregate score (C) and the level of folate intake (low <406μg/d or high ≥406μg/d) in non-diabetic subjects (n=3192 for the FTO rs9939609 and n=3180 for the MC4R rs17782313. P-int: P interaction values for the corresponding interaction terms between folate intake (as dichotomous) and the genetic variant obtained in the corresponding multivariate adjusted regression model including sex, age (as continuous), center, total energy intake (as continuous), physical activity (as dichotomous), folate intake (as dichotomous), the genetic variable (as categorical), and body mass index (as continuous) as covariates. *: P=0.043 for trend in the comparison of means in the multivariate adjusted model depending on the FTO rs9939609 genotype; **: P=0.027 for trend in the comparison of means in the adjusted model depending on the FTO/MC4R aggregate score. Error bars: SE of means.

                                        Finally, taking into account that there is evidence to suggest [52] that dietary fiber could modify the association between the FTO rs9939609 and obesity risk and considering that folate intake is strongly correlated with fiber intake (rho=0.801; P<0.001 in this population), we have adjusted the effects of folate for total fiber intake (as continuous in g/d). After this additional adjustment in the multivariate model, the statistical interaction of the interaction term between folate intake and the FTO polymorphism or between folate and the aggregate score in determining fasting glucose concentrations in non-diabetic subjects did not change in significance level (P-int: 0.028 and P-int: 0.047, respectively).

                                        Discussion

                                        In this study, in which type 2 diabetes cases and non-diabetic subjects did not differ in BMI, we found no statistically significant association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and type 2 diabetes when analyzing the population as a whole. This result agrees with some previous studies in which no association with type 2 diabetes was reported [6, 2830]. However, in other investigations higher type 2 diabetes risk in carriers of the minor allele (obesity-risk allele) has been reported [1317, 20, 21, 2329]. Among them there were many studies [1, 23, 2729], including the first GWAs that detected the association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and obesity risk [1], in which such association with type 2 diabetes disappears after adjusting for BMI, leading the authors to conclude that as the association between the FTO polymorphism and type 2 diabetes was mediated by BMI, the FTO is a susceptibility locus for obesity, but not for type 2 diabetes. However, in other reports [1317, 20, 21] the association of the FTO minor allele with type 2 diabetes risk persisted even after adjustment for BMI increasing the evidence that the FTO can also be considered a diabetes-prone gene. However, some of these studies have been criticized for analyzing prevalent cases of type 2 diabetes and for differences of BMI between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects [24], recommending future case-control studies paired by BMI in order to better examine the independent effects. In the PREDIMED study, we fulfilled this requirement of having no differences in BMI between groups. This is a strength of our study and we were able to better analyze the effects of the FTO on type 2 diabetes more specifically.

                                        Accordingly, the main finding and novelty of our results is that we have found that the association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and type 2 diabetes depends on the diet consumed. Thus, when the dietary pattern departed from the traditional MedDiet (low-adherence to the MedDiet), the FTO rs9939609 was significantly associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk, while a good adherence to the MedDiet blunted this association. This gene-diet interaction was robust regardless of adjustment for BMI. Our results are supported by studies in mice in which a modulation by diet on the association of the fto gene with glucose intolerance has been reported [32]. As far as we know this is the first time that a significant interaction between the FTO rs9939609 and diet in determining type 2 diabetes has been reported in humans. Another study [53] concomitantly examined the effects of physical activity and caloric intake on the association between the FTO rs8050136 and diabetes in U.S. women, but found no statistically significant interaction. The small number of type 2 diabetes cases in that study [53] was a limitation.

                                        There is increasing evidence that the MedDiet protects against type 2 diabetes [36, 37], so it is not surprising that high adherence to this dietary pattern cancels the effects of greater genetic susceptibility to diabetes in FTO risk allele carriers. Such an interaction with diet might help explain the discrepancies in the published studies if those that did not find an association between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and diabetes risk [6, 2830] were enriched in subjects following a diet similar to high adherence to the MedDiet pattern, while studies that detected this association [1317, 21] dealt with populations with a less healthy dietary pattern, compatible with low adherence to the MedDiet.

                                        One limitation of our study is that we analyzed prevalent cases of type 2 diabetes, as the incidence of diabetes in our cohort is still being compiled. Nevertheless, the dietary pattern of our study subjects was quite stable over time [44, 54] and we did not detect differences in the adherence to the MedDiet depending on the duration of diabetes in this analysis. Similar results of no differences in diet were found in another study in Spain [35]. Thus, diabetes diagnosis did not change significantly the overall adherence to the MedDiet minimizing the reverse causation bias. Moreover, we have observed a similar protective effect of the MedDiet on type 2 diabetes risk when analyzing prevalent or incident type 2 diabetes cases in sub-samples of the PREDIMED study [37, 54]. Likewise, in a Scandinavian population [14], the FTO rs9939609 was associated with both prevalent type 2 diabetes (OR 1.13; P<0.001) and the risk of developing incident type 2 diabetes (OR 1.16; P<0.001) having comparable results. Thus, although it is necessary to investigate the effect of the interaction between the level of adherence to the MedDiet and the FTO rs9939609 on incident type 2 diabetes cases in future studies, it is foreseeable that the results would be similar.

                                        Just as for the FTO rs9939609, we found no associations of the MC4R rs17782313 with type 2 diabetes for the whole cohort despite a recent meta-analysis identifying the MC4R loci as a new loci related to type 2 diabetes in European populations [23]. Again, prior results from genetic association studies regarding this polymorphism and type 2 diabetes are discordant and sometimes vary after adjustment for BMI [2, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26]. Although Qi et al [18] described a higher risk of type 2 diabetes in carriers of the minor allele, supporting preliminary data of Loos et al [2], Thomsen et al [25] in a large sample of Danish subjects did not find such association. Noticeably, we detected, for the MC4R rs17782313, a similar interaction with adherence to the MedDiet as for the FTO rs9939609, and this is also a relevant and novel finding of the present investigation. Moreover, when we analyzed the aggregate genetic score of the FTO and MC4R polymorphisms, we also observed an additive effect of these polymorphisms on the gene-diet interaction, thus strengthening our results.

                                        Besides examining the genetic interactions with adherence to the MedDiet, we analyzed interactions with various macronutrients and food groups, but found none (not shown). This strengthens the notion that for dietary modulation the contribution of one food is not crucial, but it is rather the overall dietary pattern with various foods or nutrients synergizing among them that is important. Considering the significant gene-diet interaction results that we have obtained for the FTO and MC4R loci, it would be interesting in future studies to analyze this interaction for other polymorphisms previously associated with obesity and/or diabetes [5558].

                                        Finally regarding our secondary objective aimed on studying the role of folate intake in this gene-diet interaction, given that recent literature is highlighting the importance of epigenetics in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes [42, 59, 60], we found interesting preliminary results that require confirmation in future studies. Although no interaction of folate intake with the genetic variants on type 2 diabetes was observed, we examined fasting glucose concentrations as a more dynamic diabetes-related trait and found a statistically significant interaction between the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism and folate intake in non-diabetic subjects. Thus, the FTO variant allele tended to be associated with higher fasting glucose concentrations when folate intake was low, but not when it was high. Currently, the FTO gene has been outlined as an important gene in which effects may be mediated through epigenetics [61]. A study reported that the CpG site in the first intron of the FTO gene was hypomethylated in type 2 diabetes cases relative to controls [60]. Folate is required for the synthesis of S-adenosyl methionine, which serves as a methyl donor for DNA methylation events; thereby folate availability may be crucial in the DNA methylation status [40]. The MedDiet is rich in folate and so one of the mechanisms underlying its protective effect against type 2 diabetes could be the influence of folate on DNA-methylation and fasting glucose. Some clinical trials have shown folic acid supplementation reduces insulin resistance [62]. Although it could be one of the mechanisms that may contribute to explaining the observed gene-diet interaction, we believe that it is not the only one and that more research has to be undertaken on this point. Although for MC4R we found no significant interaction with folate, there was a similar trend and, when analyzing the aggregate variable of both polymorphisms, the interaction term reached statistical significance, supporting additive effects. In this regard, there is a study in mice showing that diet might have an effect on the methylation status of the Mc4r gene [37]. However, our statistically significant results should be accepted with caution as folate intake may simply reflect a healthy dietary pattern and not a causal association with that micronutrient, given that, in our study, we did not carry out a methylation analysis to test this hypothesis. Moreover, although we have found a nominally significant interaction between the FTO polymorphism and the aggregate score and folate intake in determining fasting plasma glucose concentrations, we cannot rule out the possibility that, as this is a secondary hypothesis and we have not corrected the P-values for multiple comparisons, the association obtained represents a false positive result.

                                        Conclusion

                                        In conclusion, we described for the first time a statistically significant gene-diet interaction of the FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 with adherence to the MedDiet on type 2 diabetes. When adherence was low, the obesity risk alleles were associated with type 2 diabetes regardless of BMI, but more studies are needed to confirm this interaction. Although we have also found a statistically significant interaction with folate intake on fasting glucose that may help to explain in part this interaction, the potential mechanisms behind this interaction remain to be investigated in further studies.

                                        Declarations

                                        Acknowledgments

                                        We thank the participants for their enthusiastic collaboration, the PREDIMED personnel for excellent assistance, and the personnel of all affiliated primary care centers. The funding sources played no role in the experimental design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

                                        This study has been supported by The Spanish Ministry of Health (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) and the Ministry of Economy and Innovation, Spain and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (projects PI051839, PI070240, PI1001407, G03/140, CIBER 06/03, RD06/0045 PI07-0954, CNIC-06, PI11/02505, SAF2009-12304 and AGL2010-22319-C03-03), by contracts 53-K06-5-10 and 58-1950-9-001 from the US Department of Agriculture Research, USA and by the Generalitat Valenciana, Spain (AP111/10, AP-042/11, BEST11-263, BEST/2011/261, GVACOMP2011-151, ACOMP/2011/145 and ACOMP/2012/190).

                                        Authors’ Affiliations

                                        (1)
                                        Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Valencia
                                        (2)
                                        CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
                                        (3)
                                        Department of Computing Languages and Systems, University Jaume I
                                        (4)
                                        Nutrition and Genomics Laboratory, JM-USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University
                                        (5)
                                        Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Navarra
                                        (6)
                                        Human Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine, IISPV, University Rovira i Virgili
                                        (7)
                                        Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Municipal Institut for Medical Research (IMIM)
                                        (8)
                                        Department of Cardiology, Hospital Txagorritxu
                                        (9)
                                        Department of Family Medicine, Primary Care Division of Sevilla, San Pablo Health Center
                                        (10)
                                        Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
                                        (11)
                                        Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Malaga
                                        (12)
                                        University Institute for Health Sciences Investigation, Hospital Son Dureta
                                        (13)
                                        Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Valencia
                                        (14)
                                        Lipids and Vascular Risk Unit, Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat
                                        (15)
                                        Primary Care Division, Catalan Institute of Health
                                        (16)
                                        Lipid Clinic, Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic
                                        (17)
                                        Department of Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Population Genetics, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC)
                                        (18)
                                        IMDEA Alimentación
                                        (19)
                                        Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS
                                        (20)
                                        Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Valencia University

                                        References

                                        1. Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, Zeggini E, Freathy RM, Lindgren CM, Perry JR, Elliott KS, Lango H, Rayner NW, Shields B, Harries LW, Barrett JC, Ellard S, Groves CJ, Knight B, Patch AM, Ness AR, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA, Ring SM, Ben-Shlomo Y, Jarvelin MR, Sovio U, Bennett AJ, Melzer D, Ferrucci L, Loos RJ, Barroso I, Wareham NJ, et al: A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science. 2007, 316: 889-894. 10.1126/science.1141634.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        2. Loos RJ, Lindgren CM, Li S, Wheeler E, Zhao JH, Prokopenko I, Inouye M, Freathy RM, Attwood AP, Beckmann JS, Berndt SI, Jacobs KB, Chanock SJ, Hayes RB, Bergmann S, Bennett AJ, Bingham SA, Bochud M, Brown M, Cauchi S, Connell JM, Cooper C, Smith GD, Day I, Dina C, De S, Dermitzakis ET, Doney AS, Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, et al: Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesity. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 768-775. 10.1038/ng.140.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        3. Peng S, Zhu Y, Xu F, Ren X, Li X, Lai M: FTO gene polymorphisms and obesity risk: a meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2011, 9: 71-10.1186/1741-7015-9-71.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        4. Hardy R, Wills AK, Wong A, Elks CE, Wareham NJ, Loos RJ, Kuh D, Ong KK: Life course variations in the associations between FTO and MC4R gene variants and body size. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19: 545-552. 10.1093/hmg/ddp504.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        5. Vasan SK, Fall T, Neville MJ, Antonisamy B, Fall CH, Geethanjali FS, Gu HF, Raghupathy P, Samuel P, Thomas N, Brismar K, Ingelsson E, Karpe : Associations of Variants in FTO and Near MC4R With Obesity Traits in South Asian Indians. Obesity. 2012, 10.1038/oby.2012.64. in press.
                                        6. Sentinelli F, Incani M, Coccia F, Capoccia D, Cambuli VM, Romeo S, Cossu E, Cavallo MG, Leonetti F, Baroni MG: Association of FTO polymorphisms with early age of obesity in obese Italian subjects. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012, 2012: 872176.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        7. Cecil J, Dalton M, Finlayson G, Blundell J, Hetherington M, Palmer C: Obesity and eating behaviour in children and adolescents: contribution of common gene polymorphisms. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012, 24: 200-210. 10.3109/09540261.2012.685056.View ArticlePubMed
                                        8. Schmid PM, Heid I, Buechler C, Steege A, Resch M, Birner C, Endemann DH, Riegger GA, Luchner A: Expression of fourteen novel obesity-related genes in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 48-10.1186/1475-2840-11-48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        9. Huang W, Sun Y, Sun J: Combined effects of FTO rs9939609 and MC4R rs17782313 on obesity and BMI in Chinese Han populations. Endocrine. 2011 Feb, 39: 69-74. 10.1007/s12020-010-9413-6.View ArticlePubMed
                                        10. Steemburgo T, de Azevedo MJ, Gross JL, Milagro F, Campión J, Martínez JA: The rs7204609 polymorphism in the fat mass and obesity-associated gene is positively associated with central obesity and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes from Southern Brazil. J Ren Nutr. 2012, 22: 228-236. 10.1053/j.jrn.2011.03.004.View ArticlePubMed
                                        11. Ewens KG, Jones MR, Ankener W, Stewart DR, Urbanek M, Dunaif A, Legro RS, Chua A, Azziz R, Spielman RS, Goodarzi MO, Strauss JF: FTO and MC4R gene variants are associated with obesity in polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e16390-10.1371/journal.pone.0016390.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        12. Tabara Y, Osawa H, Guo H, Kawamoto R, Onuma H, Shimizu I, Takara Y, Nishida W, Yamamoto M, Makino H, Kohara K, Miki T: Prognostic significance of FTO genotype in the development of obesity in Japanese: the J-SHIPP study. Int J Obes. 2009, 33: 1243-1248. 10.1038/ijo.2009.161.View Article
                                        13. Li H, Kilpeläinen TO, Liu C, Zhu J, Liu Y, Hu C, Yang Z, Zhang W, Bao W, Cha S, Wu Y, Yang T, Sekine A, Choi BY, Yajnik CS, Zhou D, Takeuchi F, Yamamoto K, Chan JC, Mani KR, Been LF, Imamura M, Nakashima E, Lee N, Fujisawa T, Karasawa S, Wen W, Joglekar CV, Lu W, Chang Y, Xiang Y, et al: Association of genetic variation in FTO with risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes with data from 96,551 East and South Asians. Diabetologia. 2012, 55: 981-995. 10.1007/s00125-011-2370-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        14. Hertel JK, Johansson S, Sonestedt E, Jonsson A, Lie RT, Platou CG, Nilsson PM, Rukh G, Midthjell K, Hveem K, Melander O, Groop L, Lyssenko V, Molven A, Orho-Melander M, Njølstad PR: FTO, type 2 diabetes, and weight gain throughout adult life: a meta-analysis of 41,504 subjects from the Scandinavian HUNT, MDC, and MPP studies. Diabetes. 2011, 60: 1637-1644. 10.2337/db10-1340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        15. Cauchi S, Ezzidi I, El Achhab Y, Mtiraoui N, Chaieb L, Salah D, Nejjari C, Labrune Y, Yengo L, Beury D, Vaxillaire M, Mahjoub T, Chikri M, Froguel P: European genetic variants associated with type 2 diabetes in North African Arabs. Diabetes Metab. 2012, in press (PMID: 22463974).
                                        16. Rees SD, Islam M, Hydrie MZ, Chaudhary B, Bellary S, Hashmi S, O’Hare JP, Kumar S, Sanghera DK, Chaturvedi N, Barnett AH, Shera AS, Weedon MN, Basit A, Frayling TM, Kelly MA, Jafar TH: An FTO variant is associated with Type 2 diabetes in South Asian populations after accounting for body mass index and waist circumference. Diabet Med. 2011, 28: 673-680. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03257.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        17. Liu Y, Liu Z, Song Y, Zhou D, Zhang D, Zhao T, Chen Z, Yu L, Yang Y, Feng G, Li J, Zhang J, Liu S, Zhang Z, He L, Xu H: Meta-analysis added power to identify variants in FTO associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity in the Asian population. Obesity. 2010, 18: 1619-1624. 10.1038/oby.2009.469.View ArticlePubMed
                                        18. Qi L, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Hu FB: The common obesity variant near MC4R gene is associated with higher intakes of total energy and dietary fat, weight change and diabetes risk in women. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 3502-3508. 10.1093/hmg/ddn242.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        19. Thearle MS, Muller YL, Hanson RL, Mullins M, Abdussamad M, Tran J, Knowler WC, Bogardus C, Krakoff J, Baier LJ: Greater impact of melanocortin-4 receptor deficiency on rates of growth and risk of type 2 diabetes during childhood compared with adulthood in Pima Indians. Diabetes. 2012, 61: 250-257. 10.2337/db11-0708.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        20. Legry V, Cottel D, Ferrières J, Arveiler D, Andrieux N, Bingham A, Wagner A, Ruidavets JB, Ducimetière P, Amouyel P, Meirhaeghe A: Effect of an FTO polymorphism on fat mass, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French MONICA Study. Metabolism. 2009, 58: 971-975. 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.02.019.View ArticlePubMed
                                        21. Bressler J, Kao WH, Pankow JS, Boerwinkle E: Risk of type 2 diabetes and obesity is differentially associated with variation in FTO in whites and African-Americans in the ARIC study. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10521-10.1371/journal.pone.0010521.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        22. Xi B, Takeuchi F, Chandak GR, Kato N, Pan HW, Zhou DH, Pan HY, Mi J, AGEN-T2D Consortium: Common polymorphism near the MC4R gene is associated with type 2 diabetes: data from a meta-analysis of 123,373 individuals. Diabetologia. 2012, in press (PMID: 22869321).
                                        23. Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, Ferreira T, Segrè AV, Steinthorsdottir V, Strawbridge RJ, Khan H, Grallert H, Mahajan A, Prokopenko I, Kang HM, Dina C, Esko T, Fraser RM, Kanoni S, Kumar A, Lagou V, Langenberg C, Luan J, Lindgren CM, Müller-Nurasyid M, Pechlivanis S, Rayner NW, Scott LJ, Wiltshire S, Yengo L, Kinnunen L, Rossin EJ, Raychaudhuri S, The DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium, et al: Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2012, 10.1038/ng.2383. in press.
                                        24. Meyre D: Is FTO a type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene?. Diabetologia. 2012, 55: 873-876. 10.1007/s00125-012-2478-4.View ArticlePubMed
                                        25. Thomsen M, Dahl M, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG: β2-adrenergic receptor Thr164Ile polymorphism, obesity, and diabetes: comparison with FTO, MC4R, and TMEM18 polymorphisms in more than 64,000 individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97: E1074-E1079. 10.1210/jc.2011-3282.View ArticlePubMed
                                        26. Ng MC, Tam CH, So WY, Ho JS, Chan AW, Lee HM, Wang Y, Lam VK, Chan JC, Ma RC: Implication of genetic variants near NEGR1, SEC16B, TMEM18, ETV5/DGKG, GNPDA2, LIN7C/BDNF, MTCH2, BCDIN3D/FAIM2, SH2B1, FTO, MC4R, and KCTD15 with obesity and type 2 diabetes in 7705 Chinese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 2418-2425. 10.1210/jc.2009-2077.View ArticlePubMed
                                        27. Tan JT, Dorajoo R, Seielstad M, Sim XL, Ong RT, Chia KS, Wong TY, Saw SM, Chew SK, Aung T, Tai ES: FTO variants are associated with obesity in the Chinese and Malay populations in Singapore. Diabetes. 2008, 57: 2851-2857. 10.2337/db08-0214.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        28. Chauhan G, Tabassum R, Mahajan A, Dwivedi OP, Mahendran Y, Kaur I, Nigam S, Dubey H, Varma B, Madhu SV, Mathur SK, Ghosh S, Tandon N, Bharadwaj D: Common variants of FTO and the risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes in Indians. J Hum Genet. 2011, 56: 720-726. 10.1038/jhg.2011.87.View ArticlePubMed
                                        29. Xi B, Mi J: FTO polymorphisms are associated with obesity but not with diabetes in East Asian populations: a meta-analysis. Biomed Environ Sci. 2009, 22: 449-457. 10.1016/S0895-3988(10)60001-3.View ArticlePubMed
                                        30. Lee YH, Kang ES, Kim SH, Han SJ, Kim CH, Kim HJ, Ahn CW, Cha BS, Nam M, Nam CM, Lee HC: Association between polymorphisms in SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKN2A/B, IGF2BP2, FTO, WFS1, CDKAL1, KCNQ1 and type 2 diabetes in the Korean population. J Hum Genet. 2008, 53: 991-998. 10.1007/s10038-008-0341-8.View ArticlePubMed
                                        31. Zobel DP, Andreasen CH, Grarup N, Eiberg H, Sørensen TI, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Jørgensen T, Pedersen O, Hansen T: Variants near MC4R are associated with obesity and influence obesity-related quantitative traits in a population of middle-aged people: studies of 14,940 Danes. Diabetes. 2009, 58: 757-764.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        32. Church C, Moir L, McMurray F, Girard C, Banks GT, Teboul L, Wells S, Brüning JC, Nolan PM, Ashcroft FM, Cox RD: Overexpression of Fto leads to increased food intake and results in obesity. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 1086-1092. 10.1038/ng.713.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        33. Butler AA, Cone RD: Knockout studies defining different roles for melanocortin receptors in energy homeostasis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003, 994: 240-245. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03186.x.View ArticlePubMed
                                        34. de Koning L, Chiuve SE, Fung TT, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Hu FB: Diet-quality scores and the risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 1150-1156. 10.2337/dc10-2352.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        35. Muñoz-Pareja M, León-Muñoz LM, Guallar-Castillón P, Graciani A, López-García E, Banegas JR, Rodríguez-Artalejo F: The diet of diabetic patients in Spain in 2008–2010: accordance with the main dietary recommendations–a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e39454-10.1371/journal.pone.0039454.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        36. Salas-Salvadó J, Martinez-González MÁ, Bulló M, Ros E: The role of diet in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011, 21: B32-B48.View ArticlePubMed
                                        37. Salas-Salvadó J, Bulló M, Babio N, Martínez-González MÁ, Ibarrola-Jurado N, Basora J, Estruch R, Covas MI, Corella D, Arós F, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Ros E, PREDIMED Study Investigators: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with the Mediterranean diet: results of the PREDIMED-Reus nutrition intervention randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 14-19. 10.2337/dc10-1288.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        38. Romaguera D, Guevara M, Norat T, Lagenberg C, Forouhi NG, Sharp S, Slimani N, Schulze MB, Buijsse B, Buckland G, Molina-Montes E, Sánchez MJ, Moreno-Iribas MC, Bendinelli B, Grioni S, van der Schouw YT, Arriola L, Beulens JW, Boeing H, Clavel-Chapelon F, Cottet V, Crowe FL, de Lauzon-Guillan B, Franks PW, Gonzalez C, Hallmans G, Kaaks R, Key TJ, Khaw K, InterAct Consortium, et al: editerranean diet and type 2 diabetes risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study: the InterAct project. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 1913-1918.View ArticlePubMed
                                        39. Serra-Majem L, Bes-Rastrollo M, Román-Viñas B, Pfrimer K, Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González MA: Dietary patterns and nutritional adequacy in a Mediterranean country. Br J Nutr. 2009, 101 (Suppl 2): S21-S28.View ArticlePubMed
                                        40. Crider KS, Yang TP, Berry RJ, Bailey LB: Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate’s role. Adv Nutr. 2012, 3: 21-38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        41. Volkmar M, Dedeurwaerder S, Cunha DA, Ndlovu MN, Defrance M, Deplus R, Calonne E, Volkmar U, Igoillo-Esteve M, Naamane N, Del Guerra S, Masini M, Bugliani M, Marchetti P, Cnop M, Eizirik DL, Fuks F: DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic dysregulation in pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic patients. EMBO J. 2012, 31: 1405-1426. 10.1038/emboj.2011.503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        42. Bell CG, Finer S, Lindgren CM, Wilson GA, Rakyan VK, Teschendorff AE, Akan P, Stupka E, Down TA, Prokopenko I, Morison IM, Mill J, Pidsley R, Deloukas P, Frayling TM, Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI, Beck S, Hitman GA, International Type 2 Diabetes 1q Consortium: Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis identifies haplotype-specific methylation in the FTO type 2 diabetes and obesity susceptibility locus. PLoS One. 2010, 18 (11): e14040-5.View Article
                                        43. Widiker S, Karst S, Wagener A, Brockmann GA: High-fat diet leads to a decreased methylation of the Mc4r gene in the obese BFMI and the lean B6 mouse lines. J Appl Genet. 2010, 51: 193-197. 10.1007/BF03195727.View ArticlePubMed
                                        44. Estruch R, Martínez-González MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Covas MI, Fiol M, Gómez-Gracia E, López-Sabater MC, Vinyoles E, Arós F, Conde M, Lahoz C, Lapetra J, Sáez G, Ros E, PREDIMED Study Investigators: Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006, 145: 1-11.View ArticlePubMed
                                        45. Martínez-González MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Ros E, Covas MI, Fiol M, Wärnberg J, Arós F, Ruíz-Gutiérrez V, Lamuela-Raventós RM, Lapetra J, Muñoz MA, Martínez JA, Sáez G, Serra-Majem L, Pintó X, Mitjavila MT, Tur JA, Portillo MD, Estruch R, for the PREDIMED Study Investigators: Cohort Profile: Design and methods of the PREDIMED study. Int J Epidemiol. 2012, 41: 377-385. 10.1093/ije/dyq250.View ArticlePubMed
                                        46. American Diabetes Association: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: S55-S60.View Article
                                        47. Schröder H, Fitó M, Estruch R, Martínez-González MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Lamuela-Raventós R, Ros E, Salaverría I, Fiol M, Lapetra J, Vinyoles E, Gómez-Gracia E, Lahoz C, Serra-Majem L, Pintó X, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Covas MI: A short screener is valid for assessing Mediterranean diet adherence among older Spanish men and women. J Nutr. 2011, 141: 1140-1145. 10.3945/jn.110.135566.View ArticlePubMed
                                        48. Martínez-González MA, García-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvadó J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D, Covas MI, Schröder H, Arós F, Gómez-Gracia E, Fiol M, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Lapetra J, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Serra-Majem L, Pintó X, Muñoz MA, Wärnberg J, Ros E, Estruch R, PREDIMED Study Investigators: A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e43134-10.1371/journal.pone.0043134.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        49. Fernández-Ballart JD, Piñol JL, Zazpe I, Corella D, Carrasco P, Toledo E, Perez-Bauer M, Martínez-González MA, Salas-Salvadó J, Martín-Moreno JM: Relative validity of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire in an elderly Mediterranean population of Spain. Br J Nutr. 2010, 103: 1808-1816. 10.1017/S0007114509993837.View ArticlePubMed
                                        50. Mataix J: Tabla de composición de alimentos (Food composition tables). 2003, Spain: Universidad de Granada, Granada, 4
                                        51. Elosua R, Garcia M, Aguilar A, Molina L, Covas MI, Marrugat J, On behalf of investigators of the MARATDON Group: Validation of the Minnesota Leisure time physical activity questionnaire in Spanish women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32: 1431-1437. 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00011.View ArticlePubMed
                                        52. Lappalainen T, Lindström J, Paananen J, Eriksson JG, Karhunen L, Tuomilehto J, Uusitupa M: Association of the fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) gene variant (rs9939609) with dietary intake in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Br J Nutr. 2012, 23: 1-7.View Article
                                        53. Ahmad T, Lee IM, Paré G, Chasman DI, Rose L, Ridker PM, Mora S: Lifestyle interaction with fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) genotype and risk of obesity in apparently healthy U.S. women. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 675-680. 10.2337/dc10-0948.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        54. Sánchez-Taínta A, Estruch R, Bulló M, Corella D, Gómez-Gracia E, Fiol M, Algorta J, Covas MI, Lapetra J, Zazpe I, Ruiz-Gutiérrez V, Ros E, Martínez-González MA, PREDIMED group: Adherence to a Mediterranean-type diet and reduced prevalence of clustered cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of 3,204 high-risk patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008, 15: 589-593. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328308ba61.View ArticlePubMed
                                        55. Ling Y, Li X, Gu Q, Chen H, Lu D, Gao X: A common polymorphism rs3781637 in MTNR1B is associated with type 2 diabetes and lipids levels in Han Chinese individuals. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 27-10.1186/1475-2840-10-27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        56. Oktavianthi S, Trimarsanto H, Febinia CA, Suastika K, Saraswati MR, Dwipayana P, Arindrarto W, Sudoyo H, Malik SG: Uncoupling protein 2 gene polymorphisms are associated with obesity. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012, 11: 41-10.1186/1475-2840-11-41.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        57. Hotta K, Kitamoto A, Kitamoto T, Mizusawa S, Teranishi H, So R, Matsuo T, Nakata Y, Hyogo H, Ochi H, Nakamura T, Kamohara S, Miyatake N, Kotani K, Komatsu R, Itoh N, Mineo I, Wada J, Yoneda M, Nakajima A, Funahashi T, Miyazaki S, Tokunaga K, Masuzaki H, Ueno T, Chayama K, Hamaguchi K, Yamada K, Hanafusa T, Oikawa S, Yoshimatsu H, et al: Association between type 2 diabetes genetic susceptibility loci and visceral and subcutaneous fat area as determined by computed tomography. J Hum Genet. 2012, 57: 305-310. 10.1038/jhg.2012.21.View ArticlePubMed
                                        58. Siitonen N, Pulkkinen L, Lindström J, Kolehmainen M, Schwab U, Eriksson JG, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Tuomilehto J, Uusitupa M: Association of ADIPOR2 gene variants with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes risk in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011, 10: 83-10.1186/1475-2840-10-83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        59. Zhao J, Goldberg J, Bremner JD, Vaccarino V: Global DNA methylation is associated with insulin resistance: a monozygotic twin study. Diabetes. 2012, 61: 542-546. 10.2337/db11-1048.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        60. Toperoff G, Aran D, Kark JD, Rosenberg M, Dubnikov T, Nissan B, Wainstein J, Friedlander Y, Levy-Lahad E, Glaser B, Hellman A: Genome-wide survey reveals predisposing diabetes type 2-related DNA methylation variations in human peripheral blood. Hum Mol Genet. 2012, 21: 371-383. 10.1093/hmg/ddr472.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                                        61. Almén MS, Jacobsson JA, Moschonis G, Benedict C, Chrousos GP, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB: Genome wide analysis reveals association of a FTO gene variant with epigenetic changes. Genomics. 2012, 99: 132-137. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.12.007.View ArticlePubMed
                                        62. Sudchada P, Saokaew S, Sridetch S, Incampa S, Jaiyen S, Khaithong W: Effect of folic acid supplementation on plasma total homocysteine levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012, in press (PMID: 22727498).

                                        Copyright

                                        © Ortega-Azorín et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

                                        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                                        Advertisement